Differentiation pattern in the use of space by males and females of two species of small mammals (Peromyscus difficilis and P. melanotis) in a temperate forest

Autores/as

  • Ivan Mijail De-La-Cruz UNAM
  • Alondra Castro-Campillo UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA UNIDAD IZTAPALAPA
  • Alejandro Zavala-Hurtado UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA UNIDAD IZTAPALAPA
  • Arturo Salame-Méndez UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA UNIDAD IZTAPALAPA
  • José Ramírez-Pulido UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA UNIDAD IZTAPALAPA

Palabras clave:

ecological distribution, Peromyscus, spatial analysis, small mammals, use of space.

Resumen

The distribution patterns of individuals together with mechanisms that maintain them have significant implications for population-level processes. Sex-specific differences in home-range may strongly influence the spatial distribution of individuals, while the differential use of space by the sexes can yield insights into the mating system and the life history of the species. Sexual differences in the use of space could be due to different habitat requirements during the breeding season. This is interesting because the males and females likely are interacting with operational sex ratios and mating strategies. Here, we evaluated for ten months of the year 2014, the spatial patterns of ecological distribution in males and females of two species of deer mice (Peromyscus difficilis and P. melanotis) that coexist in a temperate forest. Also, we assessed the variation in the use of space by males and females in both Peromyscus species and we analyze the intensity of positive association or repulsion between males and females. During drought and rain seasons, males and females of both Peromyscus were captured. The sex and reproductive status of each were identified. To analyze the spatial patterns of ecological distribution, we used the Nearest Neighbor Analysis. Kernel spatial analysis was performed to evaluate the variation in the use of space of males and females between seasons. The Ripley’s K bivariate function was carried out to assess the positive association or repulsion between males and females in each season. We found a different use of space between sexes. Our evidence shed light on the respective life histories of these species and provides information on possible factors that they may be using to coexist successfully among them. We conclude that in this temperate coniferous forest: 1) use of space by P. difficilis and P. melanotis, is influenced by both sex and by the reproductive season, and that this pattern varies, according to shifts on ecological conditions that promote variation and availability of resources during the two pluvial seasons; 2) there are interspecific differences in the use of space with conspicuous intraspecific differences in females and males of P. difficilis (e. g., males are more territorial, and both sexes only become more clustered during the breeding season), while both sexes of P. melanotis are more gregarious; and 3) there is a clear differentiation in the reproductive seasons of both species that could be related to resources availability, such as shelters and food.

Citas

Adler, G. H. 2011. Spacing patterns and social mating systems of echimyid rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 92:31-38.

Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton. U. S. A.

Allen, J. A. 1891. Notes on new or little-known North American mammals, based on recent additions to the Collection of Mammals in the American Museum of Natural History. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 3:263-310.

Allen, J. A., and F. Chapman. 1897. On a collection of mammals from Jalapa and Las Vigas, State of Veracruz, Mexico. American Museum of Natural History 9:197-268.

Adrian, O., and N. Sachser. 2011. Diversity of social and mating systems in cavies: a review. Journal of Mammalogy 92:39-53.

Álvarez-Castañeda, S. T. 2005. Peromyscus melanotis. Mammalian Species 764:1-4.

Blondel, D. V., J. Pino., and S. M. Phelps. 2009. Space use and social structure of long-tailed singing mice (Scotinomys xerampelinus). Journal of Mammalogy 90:715-723.

Brown, J., and Z. Zeng. 1989. Comparative population ecology of eleven species of rodents in the Chihuahuan desert. Ecology 70:1507-1525.

Bowers, M. A., and H. D. Smith. 1979. Differential habitat utilization by sexes of the Deermouse, Permomyscus maniculatus. Ecology 60:869-875.

Brouard, M. J., T. Coulson., C. Newman., D. W. Macdonald., C. D. Buesching., and A. W Reed. 2015. Analysis on population level reveals trappability of wild rodents is determined by Previous trap occupant. PloS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145006

Castro-Campillo, A., A. Salame-Méndez., A. Vergara-Huerta., A. Castillo., and J. Ramírez-Pulido. 2008. Fluctuaciones de micromamíferos terrestres en bosques templados aledaños a la Ciudad de México. Pp 391-410 in Avances en el Estudio de los Mamíferos de México (Espinoza, L. C., and J. Ortega, eds). Publicaciones especiales. Vol. II, Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C. Ciudad de México, México.

Carleton, M. D. 1989. Systematics and evolution. Pp. 7-141 in Advances in the Study of Peromyscus (Rodentia) (Kirkland, G. L., and Jr. J. N. Layne, eds). Texas Tech University Press. Lubbock, EE.UU.

Chesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:343-366.

Clark, P., and F. Evans. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445-453.

Clutton-Brock, T. 1989. Review lecture: mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 236:339-372.

Cluttonâ€Brock, T. H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton University Press. Princeton, U. S. A.

Cramer, M., and M. Willig. 2002. Habitat heterogeneity, habitat associations, and rodent species diversity in a sand: shinnery-oak landscape. Journal of Mammalogy 83:743-753.

CONANP. 2006. Programa de Conservación y Manejo Parque Nacional Desierto de los Leones. Dirección General de Manejo para la Conservación, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente del Gobierno del Distrito Federal, Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. http://www.sma.df.gob.mx/

Dimitri, V., J. P. Blondel, and M. P. Steven. 2009. Space use and social structure of Long-Tailed Singing Mice (Scotinomys xerampelinus). Journal of Mammalogy, 90:715-723.

Dale, M. R. T. 1999. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kindom.

Debra, M., J. Shier, and A. Randall. 1994. Spacing as a predictor of social organization in kangaroo rats (Dipodomys heermanni arenae). Journal of Mammalogy 85:1002-1008.

De-la-Cruz, I. M., A. Castro-Campillo, A. Zavala-Hurtado, A. Salame-Méndez, and J. Ramírez-Pulido. 2018. Assessing the Relation between the spatiotemporal microhabitat heterogeneity and the dispersion patterns of two syntopic small mammals in a midlatitude temperate forest. bioRxiv 278390; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/278390.

Fernández, J. A., F. García-Campuzano, and M. S. Hafner. 2010. Peromyscus difficilis (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Mammalian Species 42:220-229.

Gaulin, S. J. C., and R. W. Fitzgerald. 1988. Home range size as a predictor of mating system in Microtus. Journal of Mammalogy 69:311-319.

Gittleman, J. L., and S. D. Thompson. 1988. Energy allocation in mammalian reproduction. American Zoologist 28:863-875.

Heske, E. J., and R. S. Ostfeld. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North American voles. Journal of Mammalogy 71:510-519.

Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: PAleontologicalSTatistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1-9.

Kamler, J., and P. Gipson. 2003. Space and habitat use by male and female raccoons, Procyon lotor, in Kansas. Canadian Field Naturalist 117:218-223.

Maher, C. R., and J. R. Burger. 2011. Intraspecific variation in space use, group size, and mating systems of caviomorph rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 92:54-64.

Morris, D. W. 1984. Sexual differences in habitat use by small mammals: evolutionary strategy or reproductive constraint? Oecologia 65:51-57.

Morris, D. W., and T. J. MacEachern. 2010. Active density-dependent habitat selection in a controlled population of small mammals. Ecology 91:3131-3137.

Ostfeld, R., W. Lidicker, and E. Heske. 1985. The relationship between habitat heterogeneity, space use, and demography in a population of California Voles. Oikos 45:433-442.

Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pp. 123-166 in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (Blum M. S., and N. A. Blum., eds.). Academic Press. New York, USA.

Pianka, E. R. 1973. The Structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:53-74.

Ramírez-Pulido, J., I. Lira, S. Gaona, Z. C Müdespacher, and A. Castro. 1989. Manejo y Mantenimiento de Colecciones Mastozoológicas. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Ciudad de México, México.

Ripley, B. D. 1977. Modelling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39:172-212.

Rosenberg, M. S., and C. D. Anderson. 2011. PASSaGE: pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2:229-232.

Schoener, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27-39.

Salame-Méndez, A., J. Herrera-Muñoz, A. Castro-Campillo, and J. Ramírez-Pulido. 2003a. Valoración de esteroides sexuales en testículos de ratones juveniles de Peromyscus melanotis (Rodentia: Muridae). Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural (3ª época) I:83-90.

Salame-Méndez, A., R. M. Vigueras-Villaseñor, J. Herrera-Muñoz, E. Mendieta-Márquez, I. H. Salgado-Ugarte, A. Castro-Campillo, and J. Ramírez-Pulido. 2003b. Inmunolocalización y contenido de esteroides sexuales en ovarios de hembras de Peromyscus melanotis Allen y Chapman, 1897 (Rodentia: Muridae) durante la primera mitad de la preñez. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie) 88:43-57.

Salame-Méndez, A., R. M. Vigueras-Villaseñor, L. Altamirano-León, J. Herrera Muñoz, and A. Castro-Campillo. 2004a. Análisis histológico del epitelio seminífero y del contenido de testosterona en testículos de Peromyscus difficilis (Rodentia: Muridae) de diferentes edades. Pp. 149-160 in Homenaje a la Trayectoria Mastozoológica de José Ramírez Pulido (Castro-Campillo, A., y J. Ortega, eds). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa. Ciudad de México, México.

Salame-Méndez, A., A. Castro-Campillo, E. Mendieta-Márquez, I. H Salgado-Ugarte, J. Herrera-Muñoz, and J. Ramírez-Pulido. 2004b. Evaluación estacional de la producción de esteroides sexuales en testículos del ratón de orejas oscuras (Peromyscus melanotis Allen y Chapman, 1897) de diferentes clases de edad. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n. s.) 20:103-114.

Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. pp.136-179 in Sexual selection and the descent of man (Campbell, B., ed). Aldine. Chicago, USA.

Upton, G. J. G., and B. Fingleton. 1985. Spatial data analysis by example. Vol. 1: Point pattern and Quantitative Data. Wiley. Chichester, United Kindom.

Vázquez, J., and S. T. Álvarez-Castañeda. 2011. Spatial relationships between burrows of an insular population of Dipodomys merriami. Mammalian Biology 76:577-582.

Zavaleta, E. S., M. R. Shaw, N. R. Chiariello, H. A. Mooney, and C. B. Field. 2003. Additive effects of simulated climate changes, elevated CO2, and Nitrogen deposition on grassland diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 100:7650-7654.

Zavala-Hurtado J. A., P. L. Valverde, M. C. Herrera-Fuentes, and A. Diáz-Solis. 2000. Influence of leaf-cutting ants (Atta mexicana) on performance and dispersion patterns of perennial desert shrubs in an inter-tropical region of Central Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 46: 93-102.

Publicado

2018-11-15

Número

Sección

Articles