Potential distribution model of Ovis canadensis in northern Baja California, Mexico

Autores/as

  • Enrique de Jesús Ruiz-Mondragón Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Guillermo Romero-Figueroa Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Mario Alberto García-Aranda Especies, Sociedad y Hábitat A.C.
  • Eloy Alejandro Lozano-Cavazos Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro
  • Raúl Valdez Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology

Palabras clave:

desert bighorn sheep, ecological niche model, sheep, potential peninsular distribution model, Sierra de Juárez, wild sheep.

Resumen

The bighorn sheep is an iconic species in Baja California, being a key element for environmental conservation across its distribution range due to the huge dimensions of its habitat. In this regard, priority areas should be identified to propose feasible management practices. In this context, ecological niche models are essential because they are important methodological tools that indicate the suitability of the habitat for proper species development, based on field observations and multiple environmental variables as occupancy predictors. This investigation aims to identify the potential distribution range of the bighorn sheep in Sierra de Juarez using an ecological niche model. Indirect signs of the presence of bighorn sheep were sampled in Sierra de Juárez from January to June 2016 in order to gather evidence of the species, along with records from an aerial survey carried out in 2012. The ecological niche model was constructed applying the maximum-entropy algorithm assisted with the Maxent software. Ruggedness, orientation, slope, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), type of vegetation, and type of weather were used as predictive variables. In Sierra de Juarez, bighorn sheep inhabit an area of 49,844 ha with the following characteristics: climates ranging from very arid semi-warm [BWh(x’)] to very arid temperate [BWk(x’) and BWks]; natural vegetation comprising gallery and palm-tree patches; NDVI of 0.05 to 0.07; orientation of 0 to160°; slope of 0 to 65 %; and ruggedness of 35 to160 m (Figure 4). NDVI, vegetation type and ruggedness were the variables with the greatest contribution to the ecological niche model (Table 1). Bighorn sheep are distributed primarily in the northern and central regions of Sierra de Juárez (Figure 2). According to the niche model, these areas have environmental conditions that provide shelter and resources for this species. Therefore, it is hereby proposed to organize the local landowners to implement actions to protect the bighorn sheep habitat to warrant the conservation of this iconic species and its environment in the region studied.

Citas

Álvarez, C., T. Gallina, C. Díaz, I. Guerrero, V. Castellanos, and Z. Mesa. 2009. Evaluación de elementos estructurales del hábitat del borrego cimarrón en la Sierra del Mechudo, Baja California Sur, México. Tropical Conservation Science 2:189-203.

Arriaga, L., J. Espinoza, C. Aguilar, E. Martínez, L. Gómez, and E. Loa. 2000. Regiones Terrestres Prioritarias de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Distrito Federal, México.

Buchalski, M., A. Navarro, W. Boyce, T. Vickers, M. Tobler, L. Nordstrom, J. Alaníz, D. Gille, M. Penedo, O. Ryder, and H. Ernest. 2015. Genetic population structure of peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) indicates substantial gene flow across US-Mexico border. Biological Conservation 184:218-228.

Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). 1998. Subcuencas Hidrológicas escala 1:1000000. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis/. Consultada en abril de 2016.

Cuervo, A., O. Téllez, M. Gómez, C. Venegas, J. Manjarrez, and E. Martínez. 2014. An update of high-resolution monthly climate surfaces for Mexico. International Journal of Climatology 34:2427-2437.

Divine, D., E. Donald, and C. Douglas. 1996. Effects of the scale defining topographically suitable desert bighorn sheep habitat. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 40:13-18.

Elith, J., C. Graham, R. Anderson, M. Dudík, S. Ferrier, A. Guisan, R. Hijmans, F. Huettmann, J. Leathwick, A. Lehmann, J. Li, L. Lohmann, B. Loiselle, G. Manion, C. Moritz, M. Nakamura, Y. Nakazawa, J. Overton, T. Peterson, S. Phillips, K. Richardson, R. Scachetti, R. Schapire, J. Soberón, S. Williams, M. Wisz, and N. Zimmermann. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129-151.

Escobar, J., S. Álvarez, R. Valdez, J. Torres, S. Díaz, A. Castellanos, and R. Martínez. 2015. Detección de las preferencias de hábitat del borrego cimarrón (Ovis canadensis) en Baja California, mediante técnicas de teledetección satelital. Therya 6:519-534.

Ferrier, S., and A. Guisan. 2006. Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:393-404.

García, E., and Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). 1998. Climas, Escala 1:1 000 000 http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis/. Consultada en abril de 2016.

García, O. 2014. Caracterización de Hábitat del Borrego Cimarrón (Ovis canadensis) en la Sierra de Juárez, Baja California, México. Tesis de Licenciatura (Agrobiología), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Coahuila, México.

Guerrero, I., I. Tovar, and Álvarez S. 2003. Factores que afectan la distribución espacial del borrego cimarrón Ovis canadensis weemsi en la Sierra del Mechudo, B.C.S., México. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Serie Zoología 74:83-98.

Hernández, P., I. Franke, S. Herzog, V. Pacheco, L. Paniagua, H. Quintana, A. Soto, J. Swenson, C. Tovar, and Valqui T. 2008. Predicting species distributions in poorly studied landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:1353-1366.

Holl, S. 1982. Evaluation of bighorn sheep habitat. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 26:47–49.

Hutchinson, F. 2006. Anusplin Version 4.36 User Guide. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies. Canberra, Australia.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). 2013. Conjunto de datos vectoriales de uso de suelo y vegetación, Escala 1:250 000, Serie V http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis/. Consultada en abril de 2016.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). 2013. Continuo de Elevaciones Mexicano, 3.0. http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/datosrelieve/continental/descarga.aspx. Consultada en mayo de 2016.

Keya, Z., S. Faryadi, A. Yavari, Y. Kamali, and A. Shabani. 2016. Habitat suitability & connectivity of Alborz wild sheep in the east of Tehran, Iran. Open Journal of Ecology 6:325-342.

Khan, B., A. Ablimit, G. Khan, A. Jasra, H. Ali, R. Ali, E. Ahmad, and M. Ismail. 2016. Abundance, distribution and conservation status of Siberian ibex, Marco Polo and Blue sheep in Karakoram-Pamir mountain area. Journal of King Saud University–Science 28:216-225.

Lara, J., R. Martínez, and M. Montoya. 2001. Identification of prefered sites of peninsular bighorn sheep in Sierra San Pedro Martir, Baja California, using random walk simulation. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 45:95-102.

Lee, R. 2011. Economic aspects of and the market for desert bighorn sheep. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 51:46-49.

López, E., R. Lee, J. de Vos, R. Schweinsburg, and G. Salazar. 1999. Relación uso-disponibilidad de componentes topográficos y un modelo de calidad del hábitat para el borrego cimarrón, en Sonora, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 76:17-34.

Mandujano, S. 1994. Método para evaluar el hábitat del venado cola blanca en un bosque de coníferas. Pp. 283-297 in Ecología y manejo del venado cola blanca en México y Costa Rica (Vaughan, C., and M. Rodríguez, eds.). Universidad Nacional. Exuma, Costa Rica.

Monson, G. 1980. The Desert Bighorn. The University of Arizona Press. Tucson, U. S. A.

Naoki, K., M. Gómez, R. López, and J. Vargas. 2006. Comparación de modelos de distribución de especies para predecir la distribución potencial de vida silvestre en Bolivia. Ecología en Bolivia 41:65-78.

PATN Development Team. 2013. PATN.EXE pattern analysis software package, Versions: 3.1.2.0 http://www.patn.com.au/about/default.htm. Consultada en octubre de 2016.

Pearson, R. G., C. J. Raxworthy, M. Nakamura, and A. T. Peterson. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 34:102–117.

Pettorelli, N. 2013. The normalized difference vegetation index. Oxford University Press. New York, U. S. A.

Phillips, S., R. Anderson, and R. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231-259.

Phillips, S. 2013. A brief tutorial on Maxent, Versions: 3.3.1. www.cs.princeton.edu /~schapire/maxent/. Consultada en junio de 2016.

Purevdorj, T. S., R. Tateishi, T. Ishiyama, and Y. Honda. 1998. Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19:3519–3535.

QGIS Development Team. 2016. QGIS Geographic Information System, Versions: 2.8.6 http// qgis.osgeo.org. Consultada en febrero de 2016.

Registro Agrario Nacional (RAN). 2016. Perimetrales de los núcleos agrarios certificados, entidad federativa Baja California http://datos.ran.gob.mx/filescd/dgcat/ran_da_dgcat_poligonos_nucleos_agrarios_bc.kml. Consultada en enero de 2017.

Reyes, S. 1976. Caza del borrego cimarrón en Loreto, B. C. Bosques y Fauna 14:3-14.

Riley, S., S. DeGloria, and R. Elliot. 1999. A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences 5:23-27.

Ruiz, E. 2014. Estado actual de la población del borrego cimarrón (Ovis canadensis weemsi) en la UMA Ejido La Purísima, Baja California Sur, México. Tesis de Licenciatura (Biología), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Estado de México, México.

Sánchez, O. 2005. Ovis canadensis Shaw, 1804. Pp. 507-509 in Los Mamíferos Silvestres de México (Ceballos, G., and G. Oliva, eds.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. Distrito Federal, México.

Sánchez, R. 1978. Hábitos alimenticios del borrego cimarrón. Bosques y Fauna 1: 47-55.

Sandoval, A., and A. Espinosa. 2001. Status of bighorn management programs in Coahuila, Mexico-2000. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 45:53-61.

Soberón, J., and T. Peterson. 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2:1-10.

Uranga, T., and R. Valdez. 2011. Reintroduction of desert bighorn sheep in Chihuahua, Mexico. Desert Bighorn Council Transaction 51:32-38.

United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2015. NDVI, the foundation for remote sensing phenology. https://phenology.cr.usgs.gov/ndvi_foundation.php. Consultada en julio de 2016.

United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2016. LC80390382016112LGN00. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/. Consultada en julio de 2016.

Walters, C. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. The Blackburn Press. British Columbia, Canada.

Wilson, L., J. Blaisdell, G. Welsh, R. Weaver, R. Brigham, W. Kelly, J. Yoakum, M. Hinks, J. Turner, and J. DeForge. 1980. Desert bighorn habitat requirements and management recommendations. Desert Bighorn Council Transaction 24:1-7.

Publicado

2018-08-23

Número

Sección

Articles