Potential distribution of the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) in Northeastern Mexico

Autores/as

  • Jesús Manuel Martínez-Calderas Colegio de Postgraduados Campus San Luis Potosí Área de Fauna Silvestre
  • Octavio César Rosas-Rosas Colegio de Postgraduados Campus San Luis Potosí
  • Jorge Palacio-Núñez Colegio de Postgraduados Campus San Luis Potosí http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-8801
  • Juan Felipe Martínez-Montoya Colegio de Postgraduados Campus San Luis Potosí
  • Genaro Olmos-Oropeza Colegio de Postgraduados Campus San Luis Potosí
  • Luis Antonio Tarango-Arámbula Colegio de Postgraduados Campus San Luis Potosí

Palabras clave:

Field survey, Huasteca region, MaxEnt, Neotropical cats, camera trap

Resumen

Introduction: The ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) is a Neotropical cat which is threatened by illegal hunt and habitat destruction in the Mexican territory. Mexican and American authorities are interested in promoting their conservation. The MaxEnt algorithm allows modeling the potential distribution of elusive species, for instance, the ocelot. This has been based on trustable presence records and some other information about the habitat condition. This work was developed with the aim of generating important information about the species in Northeastern Mexico, especially, with the purpose of determining its potential distribution.Methods: Our study was conducted in six physiographic subprovinces (PSP) in the Mexican states of Tamaulipas and San Luis Potosí. Sixty-trhee recent records about the ocelot were obtained, 41 through literature and 22 from field surveys , between May 2006 to May 2009. In order to develop a prediction model which let us know the animal potential distribution, twenty-seven bioclimatic, topographic, vegetation and anthropic variables were used through the MaxEnt software.Results: The model AUC was of 0.8221±0.009. The most related variables about the ocelot presence were: precipitation of wettest month and quarter, human population density, terrain elevation, vegetation type, vegetation cover and distance to roads. The potential distribution area covers 20.8% of the study area. The PSP showing the highest potential distribution were: Llanuras y Lomerios (7.4%), Carso Huasteco (4.8%), Gran Sierra Plegada (4.5%), and Sierras y Llanuras Occidentales (3.4%). The Llanura Costera Tamaulipeca PSP showed lower potential distribution; meanwhile, Llanuras de Coahuila y Nuevo Leon and Sierras y Llanuras del Norte de Guanajuato were not suitable distribution for ocelot.Discussions and conclusions: In order to obtain the ocelot potential distribution model we use recent information collected through field work and surveys. Through this, we could achieve a robust model, where were relevant both bioclimatic and landscape variables. There are patches of habitat important in size and quality for ocelot. The PSP with the roughest landscape were the ones where the highest presence of the species. This study complements the ocelot distributional range in Northeastern Mexico and providing important information about the habitat quality in that portion of the country, as well as the difficulty to possible connectivity between Mexico and USA.

Biografía del autor/a

Jesús Manuel Martínez-Calderas, Colegio de Postgraduados Campus San Luis Potosí Área de Fauna Silvestre

Profesor Investigador AsociadoÁrea de Fauna SilvestreCampus San Luis Potosí - Colegio de Postgraduados

Citas

ANDERSON, R. P., D. LEW, AND A. T. PETERSON. 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecological Modelling 162:211-232.

ARANDA, M. 2005. Ocelote, Leopardus pardalis (Linnaeus, 1758). Pp. 359-361 in Los Mamíferos Silvestres de México (G. Ceballos y G. Oliva eds.). Fondo de Cultura Económica / CONABIO. México.

BOJORQUEZ-TAPIA, L., L. BROWER, G. CASTILLEJA, S. SANCHEZ-COLÓN, M. HERNANDEZ, W. CALVERT, S. DIAZ, P. GOMEZ-PRIEGO, G. ALCANTAR, E. MELGAREJO, M. SOLARES, L. GUTIERREZ, AND M. JUÁREZ. 2003. Mapping expert knowledge: Redesigning the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve. Conservation Biology 17:367-379.

BOOTH, G. D., M. J. NICCOLUCCI, AND E. G. SCHUSTER. 1994. Identifying proxy sets in multiple linear regression: an aid to better coeffi cient interpretation. US Departament of Agriculture, Forest Service.

BURNEO, S., J. F. GONZÁLEZ-MAYA, AND D. TIRIRA. 2009. Distribution and habitat modelling for Colombian weasel Mustela felipei in the Northern Andes. Small Carnivore Conservation 41:41-45.

CAIN, A. T., V. R TUOVILA, D. G. HEWITT, AND M. E. TEWES. 2003. Effects of a highway and mitigation projects on bobcats in southern Texas. Biological Conservation 114:189-197.

CASO, A. 1994. Home range and habitat use of three neotropical carnivores in northeast México. MsC. Dissertation. Texas A&M University.

CERVANTES-ZAMORA, Y., S. L. CORNEJO-OLGÍN, R. LUCERO-MÁRQUEZ, J. M. ESPINOZA-RODRÍGUEZ, E. MIRANDA-VIQUEZ, AND A. PINEDA-VELÁZQUEZ. 1990. Provincias Fisiográficas de México. Clasificación de Regiones Naturales de México II, IV. 10. 2. Atlas Nacional de México. Vol. II. Escala 1:4000000. Instituto de Geografía. UNAM. México.

CIAT (CENTRO INTERNACIONAL DE AGRICULTURA TROPICAL), UNEP (UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM), CIESIN (CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATION NETWORK), COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, AND THE WORLD BANK. 2005. Latin American and Caribbean Population Data Base. Version 3. Available at http://www.na.unep.net/datasets/datalist.php3. 11 July 2014.

CONTRERAS-MEDINA, R., I. LUNA-VEGA, AND C. A. RÍOS-MUÑOZ. 2010. Distribución de Taxus globosa (Taxaceae) en México: Modelos ecológicos de nicho, efectos del cambio del uso de suelo y conservación. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 83:421-433.

DI BITETTI, M., A. PAVIOLO, AND C. DE ANGELO. 2006. Density, habitat use y activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic forest of Misiones, Argentina. Journal of Zoology 270:153-163.

DILLON, A. M., AND T. M. KELLY. 2007. Ocelot radio telemetry: ocelot trap success, activity patterns, home range and density. Oryx 41:469-477.

DORMANN, C. F., J. ELITH, S. BACHER, C. BUCHMANN, G. CARL, G. CARRÉ, J. R. GARCÍA-MARQUÉZ, B. GRUBER, B. LAFOURCADE, P. J. LEITÃO, T. MÃœNKEMÃœLLER, C. MCCLEAN, P. E. OSBORNE, B. REINEKING, B. SCHRÖDER, A. K. SKIDMORE, D. ZURELL, AND S. LAUTENBACH. 2012. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27-46.

DOSWALD, N., F. ZIMMERMANN, AND U. BREITENMOSER. 2007. Testing expert groups for a habitat suitability model for the lynx Lynx lynx in the Swiss Alps. Wildlife Biology 13:430-446.

ELITH, J., C. H. GRAHAM, R. P. ANDERSON, M. DUDIK, L. G. LOHMANN, B. A. LOISELLE, G. MANION, C. MORITZ, M. NAKAMURA, Y. NAKAZAWA, J. OVERTON, A. T. MCC, A. T. PETERSON, S. J. PHILLIPS, K. S. RICHARDSON, K. S. SCACHETTI-PEREIRA, R. E. SCHAPIRE, J. SOBERON, S. WILLIAMS, M. S. WISZ, AND N. E. ZIMMERMANN. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species distribution from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129-151.

EMMONS, L. H. 1988. A field study of ocelots in Peru. Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 43:133-157.

EMMONS, L. H., P. SHERMAN, D. BOLSTER, A. GOLDIZEN, AND J. TERBORG. 1989. Ocelot behavior in moonlight. Pp. 233-242 in Advances in neotropical mammalogy (Redford, K. H. and J. F.Einsenberg, eds.). The Sandhill Crane Press, Inc. Florida.

ESRI. 2006. ArcGIS Desktop 9.2. Environmental System Research Institute. California.

GEHRING, T. M. 2000. Ecology of mammalian predators in a landscape fragmented by agriculture. Doctoral dissertation. Universidad Purdue. West Lafayette, EE.UU.

GUISAN, A., AND N. E. ZIMMERMANN. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147-186.

GRIGIONE, M., K. MENKE, C. LÓPEZ-GONZÁLEZ, R. LIST, A. BANDA, J. CARRERA, R. CARRERA, A. GIORDANO, J. MORRISON, M. STERNBERG, R. THOMAS, AND B. VAN PELT. 2009. Identifying potential conservation areas for felids in the USA and Mexico: integrating reliable knowledge across an international border. Oryx 43:78-86.

GRIGIONE, M., AND S. R. MRYKALO. 2009. Effects of artificial night lighting on endangered ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) and nocturnal prey along the United States-México border; a literature review and hypotheses of potential impacts. Urban Ecosystems 7:65-77.

HAINES, A. M., M. E. TEWES, L . L. LAACK, W. E. GRANT, AND J. YOUNG. 2005. Evaluating recovery strategies for an ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) population in the United States. Biological Conservation 126:512-522.

HALL, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons. New York.

HANSEN, M. R. DEFRIES, J. R. G. TOWNSHEND, AND R. SOHLBERG. 2000. Global land cover classification at 1km resolution using a decision tree classifier. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21:1331-1365.

HARVESON, P., M. E. TEWES, G. ANDERSON, AND L. LAACK. 2004. Habitat use by ocelots in south Texas, implications for restoration. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:948-954.

HERNANDEZ, P. A., C. H. GRAHAM, L. L. MASTER, AND D. L. ALBERT. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29:773-785.

HIJMANS, R. J., S. E. CAMERON, J. L. PARRA, P. G. JONES, AND A. JARVIS. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25:1965-1978.

HOSMER, D. W., AND S. LEMESHOW. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons. New York.

INEGI. 2002a. Síntesis de información geográfica del estado de San Luis Potosí. Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática. Aguascalientes. México.

INEGI. 2002b. Conjunto de datos Vectoriales de Vías de transporte y comunicación de las cartas vectoriales topográficas escala 1:250,000, Serie II, Continuo Nacional. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Aguascalientes. México.

INEGI. 2005. Conjunto de datos Vectoriales de la Carta de Uso del Suelo y Vegetación, Escala 1:250,000, Serie III, Continuo Nacional. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Aguascalientes. México.

INEGI. 2008. Continuo de Elevación. Nacional. Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática. Aguascalientes. México. Available at http://mapserver.inegi.org.mx. 11 june 2012.

JACKSON, V. L., L. L. LAACK, AND E. G . ZIMMERMAN. 2005. Landscape metrics associated with habitat use by ocelots on south Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:733-738.

KLAR, N., N. FERNÁNDEZ, S. KRAMER-SCHADTA, M. HERRMANNE, M. TRINZENF, I. BÃœTTNERF, AND C . NIEMITZ. 2008. Habitat selection models for European wildcat conservation. Biological Conservation 141:308-319.

LÓPEZ-GONZÁLEZ, C. A., D. E. BROWN, AND J. P. GALLO-REYNOSO. 2003. The ocelot Leopardus pardalis in north-western Mexico: ecology, distribution and conservation status. Oryx 37:358-364.

LUDLOW, M. E., AND M. E. SUNQUIST. 1987. Ecology and behavior of ocelots in Venezuela. National Geographic Research 3:447-461.

MAFFEI, L., A. NOSS, E. CUELLAR, AND D. RUMIZ. 2005. Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity and ranging behavior in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:1-6.

MARTÍNEZ-CALDERAS, J. M., O. C. ROSAS-ROSAS, J. F. MARTÍNEZ-MONTOYA, L. A. TARANGO ÁRAMBULA, F. CLEMENTE-SÁNCHEZ, M. M. CROSBY-GALVÁN, AND M. D. SÁNCHEZ-HERMOSILLO. 2011. Distribución del ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en San Luis Potosí, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 82:907-1004.

MARTÍNEZ-MEYER, E. 1997. Ecología del ocelote (Leopardus pardalis) en la región de Chamela, Jalisco, México. Dissertation. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

MORENO, R., AND J. GIACALONE. 2006. Ecological data obtained from latrine use by ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Tecnociencia 8:7-21.

NIEDZIALKOWSKA, M., W. JEDRZEJEWSKI, R. M. MYSLAJEK, S. NOWAK, B. JEDRZEJEWSKA, AND K. SCHMIDT. 2006. Environmental correlates of Eurasian lynx occurrence in Poland - Large scale census and GIS mapping. Biological Conservation 133:63-69.

NOWELL, K., AND P. JACKSON. 1996. Wild Cats: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. UICN. Gland, Switzerland.

NUPP, T. E., AND R. K. SWIHART. 2000. Landscape-level correlates of small mammal assemblages in forest fragments of farmland. Journal of Mammalogy 81:512–526.

ORTEGA-HUERTA, M., AND K. MEDLEY. 1999. Landscape analysis of jaguar (Panthera onca) habitat using sighting records in the Sierra de Tamaulipas, Mexico. Environmental Conservation 26:257-269.

PEARSON, R. G., C. J. RAXWORTHY, M. NAKAMURA, AND A. T. PETERSON. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 34:102-117.

PETERSON, A. T., M PAPES, AND M. EATON. 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30:550-560.

PHILLIPS, S. J., R. P. ANDERSON, AND R. E. SCHAPIRE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling in species geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling 190:231-259.

REYES-HERNÁNDEZ, H., M. AGUILAR-ROBLEDO, J. R. AGUIRRE-RIBERA, M. SILVA-APARICIO, AND I. R. TREJO-VÁZQUEZ. 2007. Caracterización de remanentes arbóreos y razones de su permanencia en el área del proyecto Pujal-Coy, San Luis Potosí, México. Pp. 85-104 in Corredores biológicos: acercamiento conceptual y experiencias en América (Chassot, O., y C. Morera, eds.). Centro Científico Tropical, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica/Escuela de Ciencias Geográficas, Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia. Costa Rica.

RISSLER, L. J., AND J. J. APODACA. 2007. Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Systematic Biology 56:924-942.

SEMARNAT. 2010. NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario oficial de la federación. Ciudad de México. México.

TEWES, M. E., AND R. W. HUGHES. 2001. Ocelot management and conservation along transportation corridors in Southern Texas. Pp. 559-564 in Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation. (Irwin, C. L., P. Garrett and K. P. McDermott, eds.). Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State University Keystone, Co. 24-28 September 2001.

TREJO, I., AND R. DIRZO. 2000. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biological Conservation 94:133-142.

TROLLE, M., AND M. KERY. 2003. Estimation of ocelot density in the Pantanal using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. Journal of Mammology 84:607-614.

TROLLE, M., AND M. KERY. 2005. Camera-trap study of ocelot and other secretive mammals in the northern Pantanal. Mammalia 69:405-412.

VAUGHAN, C. 1983. A report on dense forest habitat for endangered wildlife species in Costa Rica. National University, Heredia. Costa Rica.

WARREN, D. L., R. E. GLOR, AND M. TURELLI. 2009. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography, 33: 607-611 (Version 0)

WILCOVE, D. S. 1985. Nest depredation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66:1211–1214.

WOODROFFE, R. 2000. Predators and people; using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal Conservation 3:165-173.

WOLF, M., AND S. ALE. 2009. Signs at the top: habitat features influencing snow leopard Uncia uncia activity in Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. Journal of Mammalogy 90: 604-611.

Publicado

2015-09-03

Número

Sección

Articles