Diet composition and selection of the bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in Sierra El Mechudo, Baja California Sur, Mexico

Authors

  • Israel Guerreo-Cárdenas Centro de investigaciones Biológicas del noroeste
  • Sonia Gallina
  • Pablo Corcuera
  • Sergio Álvarez-Cárdenas
  • Rafael Ramírez-Orduña

Keywords:

Digestible energy, diversity, opportunistic, selection index, use-availability

Abstract

Water, food and nutrition are three of the main factors that regulate the distribution and abundance of wildlife species in a given area. In Baja California Sur, Mexico, the bighorn sheep is one of the most appreciated species for its ecological and economic value within the peninsular desert ecosystem; however, many aspects of its biology, ecology and population status remain unknown. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the diet composition of the bighorn sheep, analyzing the seasonal use and availability patterns of the plant species consumed. Using two food selection indices, we tested the hypothesis that the bighorn sheep opportunistically selects plant species from its habitat in the southern zone of Sierra El Mechudo, Baja California Sur, Mexico. The vegetation was characterized by means of 50 linear transects measuring 100 m x 5 m (500 m2). The diet of the bighorn sheep was evaluated through the microhistological analysis of feces. We calculated the percentage of in-vitro dry-matter digestibility and the digestible energy of forage consumed by sheep. The similarity of seasonal vs. annual diet was determined through a cluster analysis. From two food selection indices (Ivlev’s electivity, Bonferroni), we estimated the proportion of use of plant species consumed by sheep to determine food preferences. In the habitat, we identified 21 families with 63 species in 2010 and 22 families with 50 species in 2011. Shrubs were the dominant forms. The analyses of faeces identified 47 species, consisting of 27 shrubs (62.1 %), 12 forbs (26.9 %), six trees (10.6 %), one succulent (0.2 %) and one unidentified species (0.1 %). The cluster analysis showed seven similar groups. Ivlev’s and Bonferroni indices showed the selection of Bourrieria sonorae, Melochia tomentosa and Caesalpinia placida by bighorn sheep in 2010; in 2011, it selected Bursera epinnata, Caesalpinia placida and Larrea tridentata. Non-significant differences between seasons were observed regarding the composition of plant species in the diet. Shrubs were the dominant life forms, followed by trees and succulents. Shrubs were the preferred food foraged by sheep, accounting for 62.1 % of the diet; this finding is consistent with values reported for Arizona and California. Non-significant differences were observed in the percent in-vitro dry matter digestibility and digestible energy of the plant species foraged by sheep. However, we found that sheep grazed preferentially on four plant species, three shrubs and one tree, of high food quality. In this study, the bighorn sheep behaved like a specialist; therefore, we rejected the hypothesis that this species forages opportunistically on plant species. Studies on the diet of the bighorn sheep are valuable to develop management plans for the species and its habitat, since these provide information to better understand the extent of vegetation use and whether distribution sites are suitable and meet with the requirements for the conservation of the species and its populations.

Author Biography

Israel Guerreo-Cárdenas, Centro de investigaciones Biológicas del noroeste

Técnico del Laboratorio de Ecología Animal

References

ALCALA-GUZMAN, H. C., AND P. R. KRAUSMAN. 2012. Diets of desert mule deer in altered habitats in the lower Sonoran Desert. California Fish and Game 98:81-103.

ALLEN, V. G., C. BATELLO, E. J. BERRETTA, J. HODGSON, AND M. KOTHMANN. 2011. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66:2–28.

ÁLVAREZ–CÁRDENAS, S., I. GUERRERO–CÁRDENAS, P. GALINA–TESSARO, AND S. GALLINA. 2001. The variables of physical habitat selection by the desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis weemsi) in the Sierra del Mechudo, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 49:357–374.

ÁLVAREZ-CÁRDENAS, S., P. GALINA-TESSARO, S. DÍAZ-CASTRO, I. GUERRERO-CÁRDENAS, A. CASTELLANOS-VERA, AND E. MESA-ZAVALA. 2009. Evaluación de elementos estructurales del hábitat del borrego cimarrón en la Sierra del Mechudo, Baja California Sur, México. Tropical Conservation Science 2:189-203.

ANTHONY, R. G., AND N. S. SMITH. 1974. Comparison of rumen and fecal analysis to describe deer diets. Journal Wildlife Managements 30: 305-311.

BAILEY, J. A. 1980. Desert bighorn, forage competition and zoogeography. Wildlife Society Bulleting 12:208-2016.

BLEICH, C. B., R. T. BOWYER, J. DEBORAH, T. O. CLARK. 1992. An analysis of forage used by mountain sheep in the eastern Mojave Desert, California. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 36:41-47.

BOLEN, E. G., AND W. L. ROBINSON. 2002. Wildlife Ecology and Management. Edition: 5th. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, U. S. A.

BONHAM, CH. D. 1989. Measurements of terrestrial vegetation. John Wiley and Sons. New York, U. S. A.

BREWER, C. E., AND L. A. HARVERSON. 2007. Diets of bighorn sheep in the Chihuahua desert. The Southwestern Naturalist 52: 97-103.

BROWN, R. W., D. D. SMITH, AND R. P. MCQUIVEY. 1977. Food habits of desert bighorn sheep in Nevada, 1956-1976. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 21: 13-16.

BROWNING, B. M., AND G. MONSON. 1980. Food. Pp. 80-92, in The Desert Bighorn Sheep: its life, history, ecology, and management (Monson, G., and L. Sumner, eds.). University of Arizona Press. Tucson, U. S. A.

BYERS, C. R., R. K. STEINHORST, AND P. R. KRAUSMAN. 1984. Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:1050-1053.

CADDEL, J., AND E. ALLEN. 2000. Forage Quality interpretations. Division of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources. Oklahoma University. Stillwater, U. S. A.

CUNNINGHAM, S., AND R. OHMART. 1986. Aspects of the ecology of desert bighorn sheep in Carrizo Canyon California. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 30:14-19.

CUNNINGHAM, S. C. 1989. Evaluation of bighorn sheep habitat. Pp. 135-160, in The desert bighorn sheep in Arizona (Lee, R. M., ed.). Arizona Game and Fish Department. Phoenix, U. S. A.

DEYOUNG, W. R., E. C. HELLGREN, T. E. FULBRIGHT, W. F. ROBBINS JR., AND I. D. HUMPHREYS. 2000. Modeling nutritional carrying capacity for translocated desert bighorn sheep in western Texas. Restoration Ecology 8:57-65.

DI MARCO, O. 2011. Estimación de la calidad de forrajes. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Producir XXI 20: 24-30.

GALLINA, S. 2012. Técnicas para conocer la dieta. Pp. 217-234, in Manual de técnicas para el estudio de la fauna (Gallina-Tessaro, S., and C. López-González, eds.). Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, INE–SEMARNAT. Ciudad de México, México.

GARCÍA, E. 1988. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Koeppen. Instituto de Geología, UNAM. Ciudad de México, México.

GEIST, V. 1971. Mountain Sheep: A Study in Behavior and Evolution. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, U. S. A.

GUERRERO-CÁRDENAS, I., I. TOVAR-ZAMORA, AND S. ÁLVAREZ-CÁRDENAS. 2003. Factores que afectan la distribución del borrego cimarrón Ovis canadensis weemsi en la Sierra del Mechudo, B.C.S., México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología 74:83-98.

HANSEN, C. G. 1980. Habitat evaluation. Pp. 320-335 in the desert bighorn sheep (Monson, G., and G. Sumner, eds.). University Arizona Press. Tucson, U. S. A.

JAKSIC, F. M. 1989. Opportunist, selective and other often-confused terms in the predation literature. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 62:7-8.

JONES, P. D., K. B. STRICKLAND, S. DEMARAIS, B. J. RUDE, S. L. EDWARS, AND P. JAMES. 2010. Soils and forage quality as predictor of White-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus morphometrics. Wildlife Biology 16:430-439.

JURGENS, M. H. 2002. Animal feeding and nutrition. 9th edition. Kendall/Hunt Publishing. Dubuke, U. S. A.

KRAUSMAN, P. R., B. D. LEOPOLD., R. F. SEEGMILLER, AND G. T. STEVEN. 1989. Relationships between desert bighorn sheep and habitat in western Arizona. Wildlife Monographs 53:66.

LACA, E. A., AND M. W. DEMMENT. 1996. Foraging strategies of grazing animals. Pp. 137-158, in The ecology and management of grazing systems (Hodgson, J., and A. W. Illius, eds.). CAB International. Wallingford, United Kindom.

MAGURRAN, A. E. 1983. Diversidad ecológica y su medición. Ed. Vendra. Barcelona, España.

MARCUM, C. L., AND D. LOFTSGAARDEN. 1980. A nonmapping technique for studying habitat preferences. Journal of Wildlife Management 44:963-968.

MARTÍNEZ, T. 2010. Selección y estrategia alimentaria de los machos, hembras y jóvenes de cabra montés (Capra pirenaica Schinz, 1838) en el suroeste de España. Galemys 22: 483-515

MCNAUGHTON, S. J. 1986. On plants and herbivores. American Naturalist 128:765-770.

MINSON, D. J. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press, Inc. New York, U. S. A.

MORENO, C. E. 2001. Métodos para determinar la biodiversidad. M&T-Manuales y Tesis SEA. Zaragoza, España.

MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D., AND H. ELLENBERG. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York, U. S. A.

NAGY, J. G., AND J. B. HAUFLER. 1987. Nutrición de los animales silvestres. Pp. 135-149, en Manual de técnicas de gestión de vida silvestre (Rodríguez T., R., ed.). The Wild Life Society. Maryland, U. S. A.

NAGY, K. A. 1987. Field metabolic rate and food requirement scaling in mammals and birds. Ecological Monographs 57:111-128.

PEÑA, J. M., AND R. P. HABIB. 1980. La técnica microhistologica. Un método para determinar la dieta la composición botánica de la dieta de herbívoros. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Pecuarias. Departamento de Manejo de Pastizales. Serie Técnico Científica I:80.

RAMÍREZ-LOZANO, R. G. 2004. Nutrición del venado cola blanca. Publicaciones Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. San Nicolás de Los Garza, México.

RAUTENSTRAUCH, K. R., AND P. R. KRAUSMAN. 1989. Influence of water availability and rainfall on movements of desert mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy 70:197–201.

ROMINGER, E. M., A. R. DALE, AND J. A. BAILEY. 1988. Shrubs in the summer diet of rocky mountain bighorn sheep. Journal of Wildlife Management 52: 47-50.

SANCHEZ, D. R. 1976. Analysis of stomach contents of bighorn sheep in Baja California. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 20:21-22.

SARH. 1983. Baja California Sur. Carta Sinóptica. Escala 1: 50 000. Carta No. 2. Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos.

SCHROEDER, J. W. 2012. Interpretating forages analysis. Department of Agriculture. North Dakota State University, U. S. A.

SEEGMILLER, R. F., AND R. D. OHMART. 1981. Ecological relationships of feral burros and desert bighorn sheep. Wildlife Monographs 78:58.

SHANK, C. C. 1982. Age-sex differences in the diets of wintering Rocky Mountain sheep. Ecology 63:627-633.

SPARKS, D. R., AND J. C. MELECHEK. 1968. Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique. Journal Range Management 21:264-265.

STRAUSS, R. E. 1979. Reliability estimates for Ivilev´s index, the forage ratio, and a proposed linear index of food selection. Transactions of American Fisheries Society 108:344-352.

STUTH, J. W. 1991. Foraging behavior. Pp. 65-83, in Grazing management. An ecological perspective (Heitschmidt, R. K., and J. W. Stuth, eds.). Timber Press, Portland, U. S. A.

SUZUKI, R. 2014. Pvclust: Hierarchical Clustering with P-values via multiscale Bootstrap Resampling. R package version 1. 3-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pvclust.

TARANGO, L. A., AND P. R. KRAUSMAN. 1997. Desert bighorn sheep in Mexico. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 41:1 7.

TARANGO, L. A., P. R. KRAUSMAN, R. VALDEZ, AND R. M. KATINIG. 2002. Research observation: Desert bighorn sheep diets in northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Journal of Range Management 55:530-534.

VALDEZ, R., AND P. R. KRAUSMAN. 1999. Description, distribution and abundance of mountain sheep in North America. The University of Arizona Press. Tucson, U. S. A.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-19

Issue

Section

Articles