Conservation biogeography in the Mexican Mountain Component: bridging conservation and patterns of endemism

Authors

  • Ricardo Morales Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
  • Tania Escalante Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
  • Elkin A. Noguera-Urbano Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
  • Niza Gámez Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
  • Gerardo Rodríguez-Tapia Unidad de Geomática, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM

Keywords:

conservation biogeography, endemicity, mammals, Mexico, surrogates, sympatry.

Abstract

The Mexican Mountain Component (MMC) includes six biogeographical provinces. In this manuscript, we propose to use endemic taxa as surrogates to prioritize for conservation areas of the MMC. We use the distribution of 24 endemic mammals to prioritize conservation sites in the MMC and to evaluate the current Mexican system of protected natural areas (PNA). We used species distribution models and the software ConsNet 2.0 to prioritize areas for conservation, evaluating two algorithms (the representation maximization problem, and the area minimization problem) and two different representation targets (10 % and 25 %) of the distributional area of endemic taxa. In addition, we considered the effects of including existing PNA and/or excluding areas with altered vegetation. The representation maximization problem including current PNA was ineffective for reaching conservation targets. Meanwhile, all area minimization problems allowed us to prioritize areas reaching the targets of surrogates. In particular, a strategy that considers area minimization problem using a target of 10 % of the distribution of surrogates, including PNA and excluding the altered vegetation, was the most favorable for maintaining the distributional patterns of the endemic mammals. This solution proposes the protection of a total of 37,460 km2, covering areas with altitude above 2,400 m located mainly in the Sierra Madre Occidental, the Transmexican Volcanic Belt, and provinces of the Sierra Madre del Sur. A prioritization strategy based on the distribution of endemic mammals as surrogates can help to maintain the distributional patterns of endemism of the Mexican biota. Key words: conservation biogeography; endemicity; mammals; Mexico; surrogates; sympatry.

Author Biographies

Ricardo Morales, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM

Biólogo

Tania Escalante, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM

Profesor Titular A de TC Def.

Elkin A. Noguera-Urbano, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM

M. en C.

Niza Gámez, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM

Bióloga

Gerardo Rodríguez-Tapia, Unidad de Geomática, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM

Técnico Académico Tit B

References

AGUADO-BAUTISTA, O., AND T. ESCALANTE. 2015. Cambios en los patrones de endemismo de los mamíferos terrestres de México por el calentamiento global. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 86: 99–110.

ANDRÉS, A. R., J. J. MORRONE, T. TERRAZAS, AND L. LÓPEZ MATA. 2006. Análisis de trazos de las especies mexicanas de Rhus subgénero Lobadium (Angiospermae: Anacardiaceae). Interciencia 31:900–904.

ARRIAGA, L., C. AGUILAR, D. ESPINOSA-ORGANISTA, AND R. JIMÉNEZ. 1997. Regionalización ecológica y biogeográfica de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (Conabio), México, D.F.

BONN, A., A. S. RODRIGUES, AND K. J. GASTON. 2002. Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? Ecology Letters 5:733–741.

CIARLEGLIO, M. 2008. Maxent2ConsNet Manual ver 1.00. University of Texas-Austin.

CIARLEGLIO, M., J.W. BARNES, AND S. SARKAR. 2010. ConsNet—A tabu search approach to the spatially coherent conservation area network design problem. Journal of Heuristics 16:537–557.

CIARLEGLIO, M., J.W. BARNES, AND S. SARKAR. 2009. ConsNet: new software for the selection of conservation area networks with spatial and multi-criteria analyses. Ecography 32:205–209.

CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL. 2014. Hotspots. Available at http://www.conservation.org/How/Pages/Hotspots.aspx 14-08-2014. (accessed August, 2014).

CROIZAT, L. 1958. Panbiogeography. Vols. 1 and 2. Caracas: Published by the author,

CROIZAT, L. 1964. Space, time, form: The biological synthesis. Caracas: Published by the author.

CUERVO-ROBAYO, A. P., AND O. MONROY-VILCHIS. 2012. Distribución potencial del jaguar Panthera onca (Carnivora: Felidae) en Guerrero, México: persistencia de zonas para su conservación. Revista de Biología Tropical 60:1357–1367.

DI MININ E., AND A. MOILANEN. 2014. Improving the surrogacy effectiveness of charismatic megafauna with well-surveyed taxonomic groups and habitat types. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:281–288.

EKLUND, J., A. ARPONEN, P. VISCONTI, AND M. CABEZA. 2011. Governance factors in the identification of global conservation priorities for mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366:2661–2669.

ESCALANTE, T. 2013. Atlas biogeográfico de los mamíferos terrestres de América del Norte: una nueva opción en internet. Therya 4:5–8.

ESCALANTE, T., AND G. RODRÍGUEZ-TAPIA. 2011. Base de datos geoespacial de mamíferos terrestres de América del Norte: una aproximación a sus patrones biogeográficos y conservación. Pp. 110–113. in Memorias de la XIX Reunión Nacional SELPER-México (Mas, J.F., G. Cuevas, and R. González, comps.). Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, UNAM, Morelia.

ESCALANTE, T., G. RODRÍGUEZ-TAPIA, M. LINAJE, P. ILLOLDI-RANGEL, AND R. GONZÁLEZ-LÓPEZ. 2013. Identification of areas of endemism from species distribution models: threshold selection and Nearctic mammals. TIP Revista Especializada en Ciencias Químico-Biológicas 16:5–17.

ESCALANTE, T., G. RODRÍGUEZ, AND J. J. MORRONE. 2005. Las provincias biogeográficas del componente Mexicano de Montaña desde la perspectiva de los mamíferos continentales. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 76:199–205.

ESCALANTE, T., V. SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, J. J. MORRONE, AND M. LINAJE. 2007. Areas of endemism of Mexican terrestrial mammals: A case study using species’ ecological niche modeling, Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity and Goloboff fit. Interciencia 32:151–159.

ESCALANTE, T., C. SZUMIK, AND J. J. MORRONE. 2009. Areas of endemism of Mexican mammals: Re-analysis applying the optimality criterion. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 98:468–478.

FAHRIG, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:487–515.

FAITH, D. P., C. A. M. REID, AND J. HUNTER. 2004. Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism for Conservation Assessment. Conservation Biology 18:255-261.

FIGUEROA, F., V. SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, P. ILLOLDI-RANGEL, AND M. LINAJE. 2011. Evaluación de la efectividad de las áreas protegidas para contener procesos de cambio en el uso del suelo y la vegetación. ¿Un índice es suficiente?. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82:951–963.

FLETCHER, JR. R. J., L. RIES, J. BATTIN, AND A. D. CHALFOUN. 2007. The role of habitat area and edge in fragmented landscapes: definitively distinct or inevitably intertwined?. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:1017–1030.

FULLER, T.M., M. MUNGUÍA, M. MAYFIELD, V. SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, S. SARKAR. 2006. Incorporating Connectivity into Conservation Planning: A Multi-Criteria Case Study from Central Mexico. Biological Conservation 133:131–142

FULLER, T.M., V. SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, P. ILLOLDI–RANGEL, M. LINAJE, AND S. SARKAR. 2007. The cost of postponing biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 134:593–600.

FULLER, T.L., H. A. THOMASSEN, M. PERALVO, W. BUERMANN, B. MILÁ, C. M. KIESWETTER, P. JARRÍN-V., S. E. C. DEVITT, E. MASON, R. M. SCHWEIZER, J. SCHLUNEGGER, J. CHAN, O. WANG, C. J. SCHNEIDER, J. P. POLLINGER, S. SAATCHI, C. H. GRAHAM, R. K. WAYNE, AND T. B. SMITH. 2013. Intraspecific morphological and genetic variation of common species predicts ranges of threatened ones. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 280:20130423.

GREHAN, J. R. 1993. Conservation biogeography and the biodiversity crisis: A global problem in space/time. Biodiversity Letters 1:134–140.

HALFFTER, G. 1962. Explicación preliminar de la distribución geográfica de los Scarabaeidae mexicanos. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 5:1–17.

HALFFTER, G. 1964. La entomofauna americana, ideas acerca de su origen y distribución. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 6:1–108.

HALFFTER, G. 1987. Biogeography of the montane entomofauna of Mexico and Central America. Annual Review of Entomology 32:95–114.

HAMEL, M.A. AND S. ANDRÉFOUËT. 2012. Biodiversity-based propositions of conservation areas in Baa Atoll, Republic of Maldives. Atoll Research Bulletin 590:223–235.

HIJMANS, R. J., S. E. CAMERON, J. L. PARRA, P. G. JONES, AND A. JARVIS. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25:1965–1978.

ILLOLDI-RANGEL, P., M. CIARLEGLIO, L. SHEINVAR, M. LINAJE, V. SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO AND S. SARKAR. 2012. Opuntia in Mexico: Identifying Priority Areas for Conserving Biodiversity in a Multi-Use Landscape. PLoS ONE 7: e36650.

ILLOLDI-RANGEL, P., T. FULLER, M. LINAJE, C. PAPPAS, V. SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, AND S. SARKAR. 2008. Solving the Maximum Representation Problem to Prioritize Areas for the Conservation of Terrestrial Mammals at Risk in Oaxaca. Diversity and Distributions 14:493– 508.

INEGI. 2013a. Uso de suelo y vegetación. Datos vectoriales escala 1:250 000 Serie V (Capa Unión). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Available at http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/. (accessed December 2013).

INEGI. 2013b. Área Natural Protegida. Recursos Naturales. Datos vectoriales escala 1: 1 000 000. Available at http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/. (accessed October 2013).

INEGI. 2013c. Topografía. Datos vectoriales 1:1 000 000. Available at http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/topografia/topografia_1m.aspx. (accessed October 2013).

INEGI. 2013d. Localidad Urbana. Topografía. Datos vectoriales 1:1 000 000. Available at http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/topografia/topografia_1m.aspx. (accessed October 2013).

IUCN. 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org. (accessed December 2013).

JUSTUS, J., T. FULLER, AND S. SARKAR. 2008. Influence of representation targets on the total area of conservation-area networks. Conservation Biology 22:673–682.

KUROSAWA, R., AND R. A. ASKINS. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds in deciduous forests in Japan. Conservation Biology 17:695–707.

LADLE, R. J., AND R. J. WHITTAKER. 2011. Conservation Biogeography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

LEWANDOWSKI, A. S., R. F. NOSS, AND D. R. PARSONS. 2010. The effectiveness of surrogate taxa for the representation of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 24:1367–1377.

LUNA-VEGA, I., J. J. MORRONE, AND T. ESCALANTE. 2010. Conservation biogeography: A viewpoint from evolutionary biogeography. Pp. 229–240 in Biogeography (Gailis, M. and S. Kalninjs, eds.). Nova-Science Publishers, New York.

MARGULES, C. R., AND R. L. PRESSEY. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253.

MARGULES, C. R., AND S. SARKAR. 2007. Systematic conservation planning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

MÉNDEZ-LARIOS, I., J. L. VILLASEÑOR, R. LIRA, J. J. MORRONE, P. DÁVILA, AND E. ORTIZ. 2005. Toward the identification of a core zone in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán biosphere reserve, Mexico, based on parsimony analysis of endemicity of flowering plant species. Interciencia 30:264–274.

MORRISON, J. C., W. SECHREST, E. DINERSTEIN, D. S. WILCOVE, AND J. F. LAMOREUX. 2007. Persistence of large mammal faunas as indicators of global human impacts. Journal of Mammalogy 88:1363–1380.

MORRONE, J. J. 2001. Homology, biogeography and areas of endemism. Diversity and Distributions 7:297–300.

MORRONE, J. J. 2005. Hacia una síntesis biogeográfica de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 76:207–252.

MORRONE, J. J. 2009. Evolutionary biogeography: An integrative approach with case studies. Columbia University Press, New York.

MORRONE, J. J., AND J. MÁRQUEZ. 2003. Aproximación a un atlas biogeográfico mexicano: componentes bióticos principales y provincias biogeográficas. Pp. 217-220 in Una perspectiva lationoamericana de la biogeografía (Morrone, J.J. and J. Llorente, eds.). Las Prensas de Ciencias, UNAM, México, D.F.

NAVARRO-SIGÃœENZA, A. G., A. LIRA-NORIEGA, A. T. PETERSON, A. OLIVERAS-DE ITA, AND A. GORDILLO-MARTÍNEZ. 2007. Diversidad, endemismo y conservación de las aves. Pp. 461–484 in Biodiversidad de la Faja Volcánica Transmexicana (Luna, I., J. J. Morrone, and D. Espinosa, eds.). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.

NORI, J., J. N. LESCANO, P. ILLOLDI-RANGEL, N. FRUTOS, M. R. CABRERA, AND G. C. LEYNAUD. 2013. The conflict between agricultural expansion and priority conservation areas: Making the right decisions before it is too late. Biological Conservation 159:507–513.

PHILLIPS, S. J., AND M. DUDÍK. 2008. Modelling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175.

PHILLIPS, S. J., R. P. ANDERSON, AND R. E. SCHAPIRE. 2006. A maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259.

PONCE-REYES, R., V. H. REYNOSO-ROSALES, J. E. WATSON, J. VANDERWAL, R. A. FULLER, R. L. PRESSEY, AND H. P. POSSINGHAM. 2012. Vulnerability of cloud forest reserves in Mexico to climate change. Nature Climate Change 2:448-452.

POSADAS, P., D. R. MIRANDA-ESQUIVEL, AND J. V. CRISCI. 2001. Using phylogenetic diversity measures to set priorities in conservation: an example from Southern South America. Conservation Biology 15:1325-1334.

R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. ver. 3.0.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org.

REDFORD, K. H., J. C. RAY, AND L. BOITANI. 2011. Mapping and navigating mammalian conservation: from analysis to action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366:2712-2721.

ROSAUER D. F., AND W. JETZ. 2014. Phylogenetic endemism in terrestrial mammals. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24:168–179.

SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, V., V. CIRELLI, M. MUNGUIA, AND S. SARKAR. 2005. Place prioritization for biodiversity representation using ecological niche modeling. Biodiversity Informatics 2:211–223.

SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO, V., AND F. FIGUEROA. 2007. La efectividad de las reservas de la biosfera en México para contener procesos de cambio en el uso de suelo y la vegetación. In Hacia una cultura de conservación de la diversidad biológica: 161–171. Halffter, G., Guevara, S. and Melic, A. (Eds.). Zaragoza: m3m: Monografías Tercer Milenio vol. 6, S.E.A.

SEMARNAT. 2010. NOM059-SEMARNAT-2010. Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Diario Oficial de la Federación, December 30, 2010.

SEMARNAT. 2014. Áreas protegidas decretadas. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Available at http://www.conanp.gob.mx/que_hacemos/. accesed 29/01/2014.

URBINA-CARDONA, N., AND O. FLORES-VILLELA. 2010. Ecological-Niche Modeling and Prioritization of Conservation-Area Networks for Mexican Herpetofauna. Conservation Biology 24:1031–1041.

VANE-WRIGHT, R. I., C. J. HUMPHRIES AND P. H. WILLIAMS. 1991. What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55:235–254.

WHITTAKER, R. J., M. B. ARAÚJO, P. JEPSON, R. J. LADLE, J. E. M. WATSON, AND K. J. WILLIS. 2005. Conservation Biogeography: Assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions 11:3–23.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-27

Issue

Section

Articles