Geographic patterns of electrophoretic and morphological variation in the sagebrush least chipmunk (Tamias minimus scrutator)
Keywords:
Developmental asymmetry, genetic drift, natural selection, population structure, western North AmericaAbstract
Variation and differentiation among populations provide a framework to decipher how populations are, or are not, changing due to gene flow, genetic drift, and selection. The sagebrush least chipmunk (Tamias minimus scrutator) is distributed in arid and semi-arid habitats throughout much of the Great Basin and adjacent regions. The broad distribution and variation in elevation of populations make this a good system to assess population variation and the forces shaping differentiation. Here, we use allozyme and morphological datasets to: 1) assess the relative roles of geographic locality and elevation of populations in shaping population structure; 2) examine the level of differentiation of peripheral and isolated populations; and 3) compare the genetic and morphological signals of population variation and structure. We sampled 312 individuals from 12 T. minimus scrutator populations and other areas of their distribution. Individuals were measured for 27 genetic and 61 morphological traits. These datasets were analyzed to determine the distribution of variation and the differentiation among populations and tested for correlations with geographic distance and elevation. Multiple approaches were used to thoroughly compare the signals from each dataset. We found 13 polymorphic electrophoretic loci with most of the variation structured among populations within regions. Eight loci exhibited elevational heterogeneity but most high-elevation populations showed no heterogeneity among populations. Thirty-two morphological characters varied among populations but with no discernable trends across regions or elevations. Populations had varying levels of asymmetric distinctness in morphological characters, but there were no significant differences among populations. Morphological and genetic distance measures were correlated and there was some evidence of a correlation of genetic and geographic distance. We also found some correlation of asymmetric distances with morphological or genetic distances at smaller scales. There was substantial variation of genetic and morphological traits among sagebrush least chipmunk populations. Each population had a unique genetic signature and significant morphological differentiation. Our results suggest that genetic drift is contributing to the structure of these populations, with some evidence of selection shaping the distribution of variation at different elevations. The peripheral populations had mixed signals of isolation among the different datasets, with an overall signature suggesting that genetic drift is also driving the variation among these populations. The different measures of population variation yielded inconsistent signals of population structure, highlighting the need for multiple approaches to assess population variation. The variation among sagebrush least chipmunk populations is impacted by a variety of factors and contemporary investigations may reveal populations responding to alterations in habitat and climate.References
ARBOGAST, B. S., AND G. J. KENAGY. 2008. Comparative phylogeography as an integrative approach to historical biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 28:819–825.
ASDELL, S. A. 1964. Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction. Cornell University Press. New York, U.S.A.
AVISE, J. C. 1976. Genetic differentiation during speciation. Pp. 106–122, in Molecular Evolution (Ayala, F. J., ed.). Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers. Sunderland, U.S.A.
AVISE, J. C., J. J. SMITH, AND F. J. AYALA. 1975. Adaptive differentiation with little genic change between two native California minnows. Evolution 29:411-426.
AYALA, F. J., ET AL. 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group IV: Genetic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics 70:113–139.
BACCUS, R. 1986. Population Biology of the Sagebrush Least Chipmunk, Eutamias minimus scrutator: Geographic Patterns of Electrophoretic, Morphometric, and Epigenetic Variation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California. Berkeley, U.S.A.
BACCUS, R., J. JOULE, AND W. J. KIMBERLING. 1980. Linkage and selection analysis of biochemical variants in Peromyscus maniculatus. Journal of Mammalogy 61:423–435.
BELL, K. C., ET AL. 2021. Lost in a sagebrush sea: comparative genetic assessment of an isolated montane population of Tamias amoneus. Journal of Mammalogy 102:173–187.
BENEDICT, B. D., A. A. CASTELLANOS, AND J. E. LIGHT. 2019. Phylogeographic assessment of the Heermann’s kangaroo rat (Dipodomys heermanni). Journal of Mammalogy 100:72–91.
BRUNSFELD, S. J., J. SULLIVAN, D. E. SOLTIS, AND ,P. S. SOLTIS. 2001. Comparative phylogeography of northwestern North America: a synthesis. Pp. 319–339, in Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Processes in a Spatial Context (Silvertown, J., and J. Antonovics, eds.). Blackwell Science. Oxford, England.
DEMBOSKI, J. R., AND J. SULLIVAN. 2003. Extensive mtDNA variation within the yellow-pine chipmunk, Tamias amoenus (Rodentia: Sciuridae), and phylogeographic inferences for northwest North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26:389–408.
DOBZHANSKY, T. 1968. On some fundamental concepts of Darwinian biology. Pp. 1–34, in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. II (Dobzhansky, T., M .K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds.). Appleton-Centry-Crofts. New York, U.S.A.
DUNMIRE, W.W. 1960. An altitudinal survey of reproduction in Peromyscus maniculatus. Ecology 42:174–182.
EANES, W. F., AND R. K. KOEHN. 1978. An analysis of genetic structure in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus L. Evolution 32:784–797.
GOULD, S. J., AND R. F. JOHNSTON. 1972. Geographic variation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 3:457–498.
GRAYSON, D. K. 1982. Towards a history of Great Basin mammals during the past 15,000 years. Pp. 82–101, in Man and Environment in the Great Basin (Madsen, D. B., and J. F. O’Connell eds.). American Anthropological Association or Society of American Archaeology. Chicago, U.S.A.
GREWAL, M. S. 1962. The rate of genetic divergence of sublines in the C57BL strain of mice. Genetics Research 3:226–237.
HALL, E. R., AND K. R. KELSON. 1959. The Mammals of North America. Vol. I. Ronald Press Co. New York, U.S.A.
HELLER, H. C. 1971. Altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (Eutamias): Interspecific aggression. Ecology 52:312–318.
HELLER, H. C. AND T. L. POULSON. 1972. Altitudinal zonation of the chipmunks (Eutamias): Adaptations to aridity and high temperature. American Midland Naturalist 87:296–313.
HEWITT, G. M. 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58:247–276.
HOEKSTRA, H. E., J. G. KRENZ, AND M. W. NACHMAN. 2004. Local adaptation in the rock pocket mouse (Chaetodipus intermedius): natural selection and phylogenetic history of populations. Heredity 94:217–228.
HORNSBY, A. D., AND M. D. MATOCQ. 2014. Patterns of evolutionary divergence and convergence in the bushy-tailed woodrat (Neotoma cinerea) across western North America. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 21:243–256.
JOHNSON, D. H. 1943. Systematic review of the chipmunks (genus Eutamias) of California. Univeristy of California Publications in Zoology 48:63–148.
KENNEDY, M. L., AND G. D. SCHNELL. 1978. Geographic variation and sexual dimorphism in Ord’s kangaroo rat, Dipodomys ordii. Journal of Mammalogy 59:45–59.
KING, M. G., AND A. C. WILSON. 1975. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188:10–116.
LARSON, A., D. B. WAKE, AND K. P. YANEY. 1984. Measuring gene flow among populations having high levels of genetic fragmentation. Genetics 106:293–308.
LEARY, R. F., F. W. ALLENDORF, AND K. L. KNUDSEN. 1985. Developmental instability and high meristic counts in interspecific hybrids of salmonid fishes. Evolution 39:1318–1326.
LEVENE, H. 1949. On a matching problem arising in genetics. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20:91–94.
LIDICKER, W. Z., JR. 1962. The nature of subspecies boundaries in a desert rodent and its implications for subspecies taxonomy. Systematic Zoology 11:160–171.
MAYR, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard, Belknap Press, Cambridge, U.S.A.
MILLER, A. H. 1956. Ecologic factors that accelerate formation of races and species of terrestrial vertebrates. Evolution 10:262–277.
MORITZ, C., ET AL.. 2008. Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park, USA. Science 322:261–264.
NEI, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590.
NEVO, E. 1978. Genetic variation in natural populations: Patterns and theory. Theoretical Population Biology 13:121–177.
NEVO, E., Y. J. KIM, C. R. SHAW, AND C. S. THAELER, JR. 1974. Genetic variation, selection, and speciation in Thomomys talpoides pocket gophers. Evolution 28:1–23.
PATTERSON, B. D. 1982. Pleistocene vicariance, montane islands, and the evolutionary divergence of some chipmunks (genus Eutamias). Journal of Mammalogy 63:387–398.
REYMENT, R. A. 1961. A note on geographic variation in European Rana. Growth 25: 219–227.
RIDDLE, B. R. 1996. The molecular phylogeographic bridge between deep and shallow history in continental biotas. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:207–211.
ROGERS, J. S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics VII. University of Texas Publication 7213:145–153.
RUBIDGE, E. M., ET AL. 2008. Climate-induced range contraction drives genetic erosion in an alpine mammal. Nature Climate Change 2:285–288.
SELANDER, R. K., ET AL. 1971. IV. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotis). Studies in Genetics VI. University of Texas Publication 7103:49–90.
SIEGEL, S. 1956. Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill. New York, U.S.A.
SLATKIN, M. 1981. Estimating levels of gene flow in natural populations. Genetics 99:323–335.
SMITH, M. F. AND J. L. PATTON. 1984. Dynamics of morphological differentiation: Temporal impact of gene flow in pocket gopher populations. Evolution 38:1079–1987.
SMITH, S. F. 1977. Social structure of chipmunk populations and its relation to resource availability and exploitation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California. Berkeley, U.S.A.
SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1969. Biometry. W.H. Freeman Press. San Francisco, U.S.A.
SOULÉ, M. 1967. Phenetics of natural populations. II. Asymmetry and evolution in a lizard. American Naturalist 101:141–160.
SOULÉ, M. AND B. BAKER. 1968. Phenetics of natural populations. IV. The population asymmetry parameter in the butterfly Coenonympha tullis. Heredity 23:611–614.
SPAULDING, W. G. 1980. The pre-settlement vegetation of the California desert. Unpublished Manuscript on file, California Bureau of Land Management. Riverside, California.
STATES, J. B. 1976 . Local adaptations in chipmunk (Eutamias amoenus) populations and evolutionary potential at species’ borders. Ecological Monographs 46:221–256.
STORZ, J. F., Z. A. CHEVIRON, G. B. MCCLELLAND, AND G. R. SCOTT. 2019. Evolution of physiological performance capacities and environmental adaptation: insights from high-elevation deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Journal of Mammalogy 100:910–922.
SULLIVAN, R. H. 1985. Phyletic, biogeographic, and ecologic relationships among montane populations of least chipmunk (Eutamias minimus) in the southwest. Systematic Zoology 34:419–448.
TURNER, B. J. 1974. Genetic divergence of Death Valley pupfish: Biochemical versus morphological evidence. Evolution 28:281–294.
VAN VALEN, L. 1974. Multivariate structural statistics in natural history. Journal of Theoretical Biology 45:235–247.
WADDINGTON, C. H. 1953. The genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7:118–132.
WRIGHT, S. 1948. On the roles of directed and random changes in gene frequency in the genetics of populations. Evolution 2:279–294.
WRIGHT, S. 1978. Evolution and Genetics of Populations. Vol. IV. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, U.S.A.
Published
Issue
Section
License
THERYA is based on its open access policy allowing free download of the complete contents of the magazine in digital format. It also authorizes the author to place the article in the format published by the magazine on your personal website, or in an open access repository, distribute copies of the article published in electronic or printed format that the author deems appropriate, and reuse part or whole article in own articles or future books, giving the corresponding credits.
