Ahead of his time: Joseph Grinnell, natural history, and inclusion and equity in STEM

Authors

  • David O. Ribble Department of Biology, Trinity University

Keywords:

Natural history, teaching, active learning, inclusion

Abstract

Joseph Grinnell designed the Natural History of the Vertebrates (NHV) course at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, over 100 years ago and the course has changed little over these years. In this essay, I connect modern pedagogical and cognitive understandings of what we know leads to success among students to the course. This analysis reveals that the course continues to be successful because it has all the elements of a student-centered, active-learning class that leads to better cognitive gains, better retention, and importantly, proportionately better gains for students from underserved populations. This study will be important for advocates of teaching natural history in biology curriculum.

References

ALLEN, D., AND K. TANNER. 2003. Approaches to cell biology teaching: Learning content in context - Problem-based learning. Cell Biology Education 2:73-81.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. 2011. Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A call to action. Washington D. C., U.S.A.

ANDERSON, J. G. T. 2017. Why ecology needs natural history. American Scientist 105:290-297.

AVRAAMIDOU, L. 2020. Science identity as a landscape of becoming: rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education 15:323-345.

HAAK, D. C., J. HILLERISLAMBERS, E. PITRE, AND S. FREEMAN. 2011. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science 332:1213-1216.

HANDELSMAN, J., S. MILLER, AND C. PFUND. 2007. Scientific Teaching. W. H. Freeman. New York, U.S.A.

JONES, J. K., JR. 1991. Genealogy of Twentieth-century systematic mammalogists in North America: The descendants of Joseph Grinnell. Pp 48-56, in Latin American Mammalogy. History, Biodiversity, and Conservation (Mares, M. A., and D. J. Schmidly, eds). University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, U.S.A.

LOPATTO, D. 2010. Undergraduate research as a high-impact student experience. Peer Review 12:27-30.

MICHAEL, J. 2006. Where’s the evidence that active-learning works? Advances in Physiology Education 30:159–167.

PERRINE, J. D., AND J. L. PATTON. 2011. Letters to the future. Pp. 211-250, in Field Notes on Science & Nature (Canfield, M. E., ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, U.S.A. and London, England.

SARMA, S., AND A. BAGIATI. 2020. Current innovation in STEM education and equity needs for the future. Paper presented at the Symposium on Imagining the Future of Undergraduate STEM education, convened by the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Available at https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/10-21-2020/imagining-the-future-of-undergraduate-stem-education-symposium Accessed 16 August 2021.

SCHMIDLY, D. J. 2005. What it means to be a naturalist and the future of natural history at American universities. Journal of Mammalogy 86:449-456.

STEIN, B. R. 2001. On her own terms: Annie Montague Alexander and the rise of science in the American West. University of California Press.

SUNDERLAND, M. E. 2013. Teaching natural history at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. The British Journal of the History of Science 46:97-121

THEOBALD, E. J., ET AL. 2020. Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Science U.S.A. 117:6476-6483.

WILCOVE, D. S., AND T. ESNER. 2000. The impending extinction of natural history. Chronicle Review, Chronicle of Higher Education 47:B24.

WILSON, E. O. 2000. On the future of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 14:1-3.

WOOD, W. B. 2009. Innovations in teaching

Downloads

Published

2022-01-04

Issue

Section

Special Contribution