Revisiting the conservation genetics of Pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus)
Keywords:
Cervidae, COI, Cyt b, D-loop, Management Genetics Units.Abstract
The Pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) is a unique species of neotropical cervid, that inhabits a wide range of open habitats including grasslands, pampas, savannas, and cerrado (Brazil) from -5° to -41° S. The reduction of the area encompassed by these habitats has been dramatically reduced to less than 2 % by human activities such as agriculture, urbanization, and poaching. Three decades ago, we initiated a molecular genetic study of the Pampas deer based on representative samples from throughout their geographic range. Our aim is to reevaluate the effect that habitat fragmentation has had on gene flow among eight wildlife Pampas deer populations and one from the captive breeding centre Estación de Cría de Fauna Autóctona (ECFA). We examined DNA sequences from three mitochondrial markers: the control region (D-loop), Cytochrome b (Cytb), and Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI). Furthermore, we compared the resolution of the different mitochondrial markers to elucidate the phylogenetic and phylogeographic patterns of the species to define Evolutionary Significant Units (ESU`s). The amount of gene flow was correlated with geographic distance among groups and populations and was consistent with limited dispersal being the primary determinant of genetic differentiation between populations. Our results showed that the D-loop was the most appropriate marker for defining Evolutionary Significant Units. We found that the critically endangered Paraná population showed significant genetic distance from the others and revealed unique haplotypes with all the mitochondrial markers. The molecular genetic results provide a mandate for habitat restoration and design a management plan to conserve these relictual populations.References
AVISE, J. C. 1992. Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: a case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos 63:62-76.
AVISE, J. C. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and a connection between genetics and demography of relevance to conservation. Conservation Biology 9:686-690.
AVISE, J. C. 1998. The history and purview of phylogeography: a personal reflection. Molecular Ecology 7:371-379.
BALLOU, J. D. 1994. Population biology. Pp. 93 - 114. In Przewalski 's horse: the history and biology of an endangered species (Boyd L., and K. A. Houpt, eds.). New York, EEUU.
BAKER S.C.; W. R. SLADE and J. L. BANNISTER. 1994. Hierarchical structure of mitochondrial DNA gene flow among humpback whales, Megaptera novaeanglie, world wide. Molecular ecology 3:313-327.
BANDELT, H. J., P. FORSTER, and A. RÖHL. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology Evolution 16:37-48.
BONADONNA, F. P., and M. T. ALBERDI, M. T. 1987. Equus stenonis Cocchi as a biostratigraphical marker in the Neogene-Quaternary of the Western Mediterranean basin: consequence on Galerian-Villafranchian chronostratigraphy. Quaternary Science Reviews 6:55-66.
CABRERA, A. 1943. Sobre la sistemaÌtica del venado y su variación individual y geograÌfica. Revista del Museo de La Plata. (n.s) Tomo III Zoología 18: 5-41.
DARWIN, C. 1860. A naturalist's voyage round the world. Journal of researches.
DUARTE, J. M. B., S. GONZÁLEZ, and J. E. MALDONADO. 2008. The surprising evolutionary history of South American deer. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49:17-22.
EXCOFFIER, L., P. SMOUSE and J. QUATTRO. 1992. Analysis of molecular variants inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
GONZÁLEZ, S., et al. 1998. Conservation genetics of the endangered Pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus). Molecular ecology 7:47-56.
GONZÁLEZ, S., et al. 2002. Morphometric differentiation of endangered Pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus), with description of new subspecies from Uruguay. Journal of mammalogy 83: 1127-1140.
GONZÁLEZ, S., et al. 2016. Conservation genetics, taxonomy, and management applications in neotropical deer. Tropical conservation: perspectives on local and global priorities, 1:238-254.
GONZÁLEZ, S., et al. 2023. Supporting the recovery of the Pampas deer in Uruguay. Oryx, 57:423-424.
GONZÁLEZ, S., and M. GIMENEZ DIXON. 2010. Pampas deer Ozotoceros bezoarticus (Linnaeus 1758). Pp. 119 - 132 in Neotropical Cervidology: biology and medicine of Latin American deer.
GONZÁLEZ, S., and M. L. MERINO. 2016. Ozotoceros bezoarticus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: e. T15803A22160030.[Internet], 10, 2016-1.
JACKSON, J. E., and A. LANGGUTH. 1987. Ecology and status of the Pampas deer in the Argentinean Pampas and Uruguay. Pp. 402-409 in Biology and Management of the Cervidae En (Wemmer C. M., ed.). Research symposia of the National Zoological Park Smithsonian Institution.
JACKSON, J. E. 1987. Ozotoceros bezoarticus. Mammalian Species 295:1-5.
KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111-120.
KUHNER, M. K., J. YAMATO, and J. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1995. Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics 140: 1421-1430.
LEIGH, J. W., and D. BRYANT. 2015. POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in ecology and evolution 6:1110-1116.
MARSHALL, L. G., R. HOFFSTETTER, and R. PASCUAL. 1983. Mammals and stratigraphy: geochronology of the continental mammal-bearing Tertiary of South America. Palaeovertebrata.
MARQUEZ, A., et al. 2006. Phylogeography and Pleistocene demographic history of the endangered marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) from the Río de la Plata Basin. Conservation genetics 7:563-575.
MERINO, M. L., et al. 1997. Veado campeiro (Ozotocerus bezoarticus Linneus 1758). In Biología e Conservacao de Cervideos Sul-Americanos; Blastocerus, Ozotoceros e Mazama. Jaboticabal. FUNEP, Brasil.
MORITZ, C. 1995. Uses of molecular phylogenies for conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 349:113-118.
NUNNEY, L., and D. R. ELAM. 1994. Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Conservation biology 8:175-184.
PINDER, L. 1994. Status of Pampas deer in Brazil. Population and Habitat Viability Assessment for the Pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus), 157-162.
ROZAS, J., et al. 2017. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular biology and evolution 34: 3299-3302.
SCHNEIDER, S. D. ROESSLI and L. EXCOFFIER. 2000. Arlequin version 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Suiza: University of Geneva.
SLATKIN M. 1987. Gene Flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787-792.
SNEATH, P. H., and SOKAL, R. R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification.
STANLY H.F., et al. 1996. Worldwide patterns of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in the harbord seal (Phoca vitulina). Molecular Biology and Evolution 13:368-382.
SRIKULNATH, K., et al. 2023. Asian Elephant Evolutionary Relationships: New Perspectives from Mitochondrial D-Loop Haplotype Diversity. Sustainability 2023, 15, 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010720.
TABERLET, P., et al. 1996. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic acids research 24:3189-3194.
TAMURA, K., G. STECHER, and S. KUMAR. 2021. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular biology and evolution 38:3022-3027.
TOBE, S. S. et al. 2010. Reconstructing Mammalian Phylogenies: A Detailed Comparison of the Cytochrome b and Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I Mitochondrial Genes. PLOS ONE 5(11): e14156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014156.
WEBER, M., and S. GONZALEZ. 2003. Latin American deer diversity and conservation: a review of status and distribution. Ecoscience 10:443-454.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
THERYA is based on its open access policy allowing free download of the complete contents of the magazine in digital format. It also authorizes the author to place the article in the format published by the magazine on your personal website, or in an open access repository, distribute copies of the article published in electronic or printed format that the author deems appropriate, and reuse part or whole article in own articles or future books, giving the corresponding credits.