Geographical distribution and niche conservatism in populations of Orthogeomys dariensis (Rodentia: Geomyidae) in the Chocó Biogeographical region
Keywords:
Biogeographic Chocó, niche conservatism, potential distribution, Geomyidae, pocket gophersAbstract
The Chocó biogeographic region is among the richest in terms of natural resources, species richness and number of endemisms. Among the species endemic to this region, the pocket gopher, Orthogeomys dariensis (Geomyidae), presents a disjunct distribution on both sides of Serranía Darien-Baudó. These populations have been considered as different species, under the names O. dariensis s.s. (northern) and O. thaeleri (southérn). This study aims to model the potential distribution of O. dariensis s.s. to assess niche divergence between these geographic populations. Using presence records, associated data, and 19 bioclimatic variables, an ecological niche-modeling approach was applied to: 1) estimate the distribution of the northern and southern populations, both separately and as a single species; 2) assess whether each population model predicts the distribution of the other, and analyze their differences through a MESS analysis; and 3) test the overlap and similarity of these niches as a proxy for niche conservatism between O. dariensis s.s. and O. thaeleri, through the estimation of ecological niche ellipsoids for the fundamental niche (EA). When considered as separate populations, these show an allopatric distribution, with the Darién-Baudó zone acting as a barrier between them. Also, O. dariensis data predicts a large part of the distribution of O. thaeleri over the study region, and vice versa. When considered as a single species, it shows a broader and continuous range, including the Darién-Baudó region as part of its potential distribution. The MESS analysis shows similar climatic conditions in general, and few particular conditions that are unique to each zone, which would not represent conditions so unique as to segregate them. Therefore, the apparent disjunction between populations may be due to the lack of records and systematic surveys in this region. This is also reflected in the moderate overlap of their niche ellipsoids, showing the ecological conditions shared between these populations. Our results support the existence of a single species, O. dariensis (sensu Hafner 2015), with a broad and continuous distribution in the Chocó biogeographic region. This is consistent with recent analyzes of DNA data showing very low genetic divergence between populations north and south of Darién-Baudó (as an intermediate area). Rather than a barrier promoting diversification, this region could represent a dispersal area for these populations.References
Alberico, M. 1990. A new species of pocket gopher (Rodentia: Geomyidae) from South America and its biogeographic significance. Pp: 103-111 in Vertebrates in the Tropics: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vertebrate Biogeography and Systematics in the Tropics (Peters G., and R. Hutterer, edit.). Bonn, June 5-8, 1989. Alexander Koenig Zoological Research Institute and Zoological Museum, Bonn, Germany.
Almendra, A. L., and D. S. Rogers. 2012. Biogeography of Central American mammals. Patterns and processes. Pp. 203-228, in Bones, Clones and Biomes. The History and Geography of Recent Neotropical Mammals (Patterson, B. D., and L. P. Costa, edit.). The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, U. S. A.
Anderson, R. P. 2000. Preliminary review of the systematic and biogeography of the spiny pocket mice (Heteromys) of Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 23 (Suplemento especial): 611-630.
Arias-Alzate, A., J. F. González-Maya, and L. R. Víquez. 2012. Conservación de mamíferos del Chocó: distribución, riqueza y representatividad de las áreas protegidas. Revista Biodiversidad Neotropical 2:71-82.
Cody, S., J. E. Richardson, V. Rull, C. Ellis, and R. T. Pennington. 2010. The great American biotic interchange revisited. Ecography 33:326-332.
Correa, A., and T. Perea. 2007. Taxonomía y algunos aspectos ecológicos del género Orthogeomys (Covatierra) y su incidencia en cultivos agrícolas en el municipio del medio Baudó (Chocó). Facultad de Ciencias Básicas. Programa de Biología con énfasis en recursos naturales. Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó.
Elith, J., and C. H. Graham. 2009. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32:66-77
Elith, J., S. J. Phillips, T. Hastie, M. Dudík, Y. E. Chee, and C. J. Yates. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17:43-57.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). 2014. ArcGIS 10.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands, U. S. A.
Gentry, A. H. 1982. Phytogeographic patterns as evidence for a Chocó refuge. Pp. 112-136, in Biological Diversification in the Tropics (Prance, G. T., ed.). Columbia University Press. New York, U. S. A.
Goldman, E. A. 1920. Mammals of Panama. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 69:1-309.
Hafner, M. S. 2015. Family Geomyidae Bonaparte, 1845. Pp. 49-51, in Mammals of South America, volume 2 - Rodents (Patton, J. L., U. F. J. Pardiñas, and G. D’Elía, edit.). The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, U. S. A.
Hall, E. R., and K. R. Kelson. l959. The mammals of North America. Vol. 1. Ronald Press. New York, U. S. A.
Handley, C. O., Jr. 1966. Checklist of the mammals of Panama. Pp. 753-795, in Ectoparasites of Panama (Wenzel, R. L., and V. J. Tipton, edit.). Field Museum of Natural History. Chicago, U. S. A.
Hernández-Camacho J. I., A. Hurtado Guerra, R. Ortiz Quijano y T. Walschburger. 1992. Unidades biogeográficas de Colombia. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, (volumen especial): 105-151.
Hershkovitz P. 1982. The recent mammals of the Neotropical region: a zoogeographic and ecological review. Pp. 311-431, ni Evolution, mammals and Southern Continents (Keast, A., F. C. Erk, and B. Glass, edit.). State University of New York Press. Albany, New York, U. S. A.
Hijmans, R. J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones, and A. Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978.
Holdridge, L. R., W. Grenke, W. H. Hatheway, T. Liang, and J. A. Tosi. 1971. Forest Environments in Tropical Life Zones: a pilot study. Pergamon Press. Oxford, U. K.
Marshall, L. G., S. D. Webb, J. J. Sepkoski, and D. M. Raup. 1982. Mammalian evolution and the Great American Interchange. Science 215:1351-1357.
McPherson, J. 2004. The effects of species’ range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact? Journal of Applied Ecology 41:811-823.
Méndez, E. 1993. Los roedores de Panamá. Publicado independientemente por el autor. Panamá. xii + 372 pp.
Monge, J. 2010. Distribución geográfica, características y clave taxonómica de las taltuzas (Orthogeomys spp. Rodentia: Geomyidae) en Costa Rica. Cuadernos de Investigación UNED 2:23-31.
Morrone J. J. 2001. Biogeografía de América Latina y el Caribe. Manuales y Tesis, volumen 3. Zaragoza, España.
Muscarella, R., P. J. Galante, M. Soleyâ€Guardia, R. A. Boria, J. M. Kass, M. Uriarte, and R. P. Anderson. 2014. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5:1198-1205.
Olson, D. M., and E. Dinerstein. 2002. The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89:199-224.
Peterson, A. T., J. Soberon, R. G. Pearson, R. P. Anderson, E. Martínez-Meyer, M. Nakamura, and M. B. Araujo. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Monographies in Population Biology, 49. Princeton University Press. Princeton, U. S. A.
Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, and R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling 190:231-259.
Phillips, S. J. and M. Dudík. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161-175.
Qiao, H., A. T. Peterson, L. P. Campbell, J. Soberon, L. Ji, and L. E. Escobar. 2016. NicheA: creating virtual species and ecological niche in multivariante environmental scenarios. Ecography 39:805-813.
Reid, F. A. 2009. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and southeast Mexico. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. New York and Oxford, U. S. A. and United Kindom.
Santika, T. 2011. Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20:181-192.
Saupe, E. E., V. Barve, C. E. Myers, J. Soberón, N. Barve, C. M. Hensz, A. T. Peterson, H. L. Owens and A. Lira-Noriega. 2012. Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors. Ecological Modelling 237-238:11–22.
Simpson, G. G. 1950. History of the fauna of Latin America. American Scientist, 38: 361-389.
Soberón, J. and M. Nakamura. 2009. Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(Supplement 2):19644-19650.
Solari, S., Y. Muñoz-Saba, J. V. Rodríguez-Mahecha, T. R. Deffler, H. E. Ramírez-Chaves, and F. Trujillo. 2013. Riqueza, endemismo y conservación de los mamíferos de Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical 20:301-365.
Spradling T. A., J. W. Demastes, D. J. Hafner, P. L. Milbach, F. A. Cervantes, and M. S. Hafner. 2016. Systematic revision of the pocket gopher genus Orthogeomys. Journal of Mammalogy 97:405-423.
Sudman, P. D. ,and M. S. Hafner. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships among Middle American pocket gophers (genus Orthogeomys) based on mtDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1:17-25.
Thuiller, W., S. Lavorel, and M. B. Araujo. 2005. Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14:347-357.
Tirira, D. G. 2010. Mamíferos de los bosques húmedos del noroccidente de Ecuador. Ediciones Murciélago Blanco y Proyecto PRIMENET. Publicación Especial 7. Quito, Ecuador.
Tocchio, L. J., R. Gurgel-Gonçalves, L. E. Escobar, and A. T. Peterson. 2015. Niche similarities among white-eared opossums (Mammalia, Didelphidae): is ecological niche modelling relevant to setting species limits. Zoologica Scripta 44:1-10.
Valdés-Velásquez, A. 2003. Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the hummingbird genus Thalurania Gould, 1848 (Aves: Trochilidae). Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Alexander Koenig Research Institute and Museum of Zoology (ZFMK), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität, Bonn.
Wiens, J. J., and C. H. Graham. 2005. Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36:519-539.
Woodman, N. and J. Pefaur. 2008. Order Soricomorpha Gregory, 1910. Pp. 177-187, in Mammals of South America. Volume 1. Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews, and Bats (Gardner, A. L., ed.). The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, U. S. A.
Published
Issue
Section
License
THERYA is based on its open access policy allowing free download of the complete contents of the magazine in digital format. It also authorizes the author to place the article in the format published by the magazine on your personal website, or in an open access repository, distribute copies of the article published in electronic or printed format that the author deems appropriate, and reuse part or whole article in own articles or future books, giving the corresponding credits.
