Influence of habitat fragmentation on bundance of Mazama temama at different scales in the cloud forest

Authors

  • Brenda Muñoz Vazquez Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
  • Sonia Gallina Tessaro Instituto de Ecología A.C.

Keywords:

cloud forest, habitat fragmentation, hunting, Mazama temama, trails.

Abstract

Brocket deer inhabit two of the most threatened ecosystems in Mexico: the cloud forest and tropical evergreen forest, due to the lack of studies little is known about their current condition. However it is believed that it is threatened by various factors among them hunting, loss and fragmentation of habitat. In this paper we established a conceptual model a priori about the relationships between deer and their habitat where we included elements of microhabitat and landscape to determine how it affects the abundance and distribution of brocket deer in the mountains of the state of Hidalgo, Mexico. We selected 14 different forested sites, in each we established two transects 250 m long where the relative abundance of tracks was estimated. During April 2011 to March 2012 three sampling visit were made in each transect. In the transects we measured: forest structure, protective cover, low tree and shrub layer. For each site we considered the size and shape of the fragments and their matrix. To determine which variables influenced the abundance of tracks we used general linear regression models. 352 brocket deer tracks were recorded in 21 km of linear transects. The average relative abundance was 16.76 tracks/km. More tracks were found in sites with higher tree density 0.4 trees / m2, 60 % canopy cover, 70 % protection cover for fawns and 50 % for adults, higher linear density 0.5 ind / 25m and shrub richness of more than four species. The abundance of deer had a positive linear relationship with the density of tree coverage to protect adults and brocket deer importance value of edible trees (P < 0.001). The estimated abundance of tracks was higher than the reported in other sites. Our data suggest that the sites C2, C4 and C7 were better suited for deer use and possibly their movements to other sites attracted by some crops, but more specific studies would be necessary like radio-telemetry to test this assumption. This research indicated that brocket deer behaves like a forest specialist, as their abundance and welfare depends on food availability, habitat quality in terms of forest cover and the remoteness of settlements, which are generally the best preserved and most inaccessible fragments.

Author Biography

Sonia Gallina Tessaro, Instituto de Ecología A.C.

Red de Biología y Conservación de Vertebrados, Investigadora titular

References

Aranda, M. 2000. Huellas y otros rastros de los mamíferos de talla grande y mediana de México. Conabio. Instituto de Ecología A. C. Xalapa, México.

Balee, W. 1994. Footprints of the forest: Kaapor ethnobotany—the historical ecology of plant utilization by an Amazonian people. Columbia University Press. New York, EE. UU.

Bello, J., Guzmán-Aguirre, C., y C. Chablé-Montero. 2004. Caracterización del habitat de tres especies de artiodáctilos en un área fragmentada de Tabasco México. Memorias VI congreso internacional sobre manejo de fauna silvestre en la Amazonía y América latina. Iquitos, Perú.

Bello, J., R. Reyna-Hurtado, y J. Wilham. 2010. Central American Red Brocket Deer Mazama temama Kerr 1792. Pp. 166-171 en Neotropical cervidology: biology and medicine of Latin American deer. (Duarte, J. M. B y S. González eds.). IUCN/FUNEP.

Bennett, A. F., J. Q. Radford, y A. Haslem. 2006. Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biological Conservation 133:250-264.

Bertolino, S. J. 2007. Microhabitat use by garden dormice during nocturnal activity. Journal of Zoology 272:176–182.

Bolaños, J. E., y E. Naranjo. 2001. Abundancia, densidad y distribución de las poblaciones de ungulados en la cuenca del Río Lacantún, Chiapas, México. Revista mexicana de Mastozoología 5:45-57.

Brady, M. J., C. A. Mcalpine, H. P. Possingham, C. J. Miller, y G. S. Baxter. 2011. Matrix is important for mammals in landscapes with small amounts of native forest habitat. Landscape Ecology 26:617–628.

Canfield, R. 1941. Application of the Line Interception Method in Sampling Range Vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39:388-394.

Conabio. 2010. El Bosque Mesófilo de Montaña en México: Amenazas y Oportunidades para su Conservación y Manejo Sostenible. Ciudad de México, México.

Cullen, L. R., R. E. Bodmer, y C. Valladares-P´adua. 2000. Effects of hunting in habitat fragments of the Atlantic Forests, Brazil. Biological Conservation 95:49–56.

Daniel, W. S., y D. B. Frels. 1971. A track-count method for censusing white-tailed deer. Austin Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Austin Texas, EE.UU

Dasmann, W. 1971. If deer are to survive. Harrisburg: Stackpole books. Pennsylvania. EE.UU.

Escamilla, A., M. Sanvicente, M. Sosa , Y C. Galindo-Leal. 2000. Habitat Mosaic, Wildlife Availability, and Hunting in the Tropical Forest of Calakmul, Mexico. Conservation Biology 146:1592-1601.

ESRI (Environmental System Research Institute). 1999. ArcView GIS v 3.2. New York, EE.UU.

Geist, V. P. 1998. Deer of the World, Their Evolution, Behavior y Ecology. Stackpole Books, Pennsylvania. EE.UU.

Griffith, B., y B.A. Youtie. 1988. Two devices for estimating foliage density and deer hiding cover. Wildlife society bulletin 16:206-210.

Ishida, M. 2004. Automatic thresholding for digital hemispherical photography. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34: 2208–2216.

Jones, J. K., D. C. Carter, y W. D. Webster. 1983. Records of Mammals from Hidalgo, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 283:378-380.

Kuusipalo, J. 1985. On the use of tree stand parameters in estimating light conditions below the canopy. Silva Fennica 192:185-196.

Lira, I., y E. Naranjo. 2003. Abundancia, preferencias de hábitat e impacto del ecoturismo sobre el puma y dos de sus presas en la reserva de la biósfera El Triunfo, Chiapas, México. Revista mexicana de Mastozoología 7:20-39.

Lopes, M. A., y S. F. Ferrari. 2000. Effects of Human Colonization on the Abundance and Diversity of Mammals in Eastern Brasilian Amazonia. Conservation Biology 146:1658-1665.

Mandujano, S. 2011. Bibliografía estudios de venados en México. Vol. 2: Instituto literario de Veracruz S. C. Xalapa, México.

Martínez-Kú, D. H., G. Escalona-Segura y J. A. Vargas-Contreras. 2008. Importancia de las aguadas para los mamíferos de talla mediana y grande en Calakmul, Campeche, México. Pp. 449-468 en Avances en el Estudio de los Mamíferos de México Vol. 2 (Lorenzo, C., E. Espinoza y J. Ortega, eds.). Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C. Distrito Federal, México.

McGarigal, K., S. A. Cushman, M. C. Neel, y E. Ene. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. Recuperado de www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats

Méndez, S. M., y J. Bello. 2005. Daños a los cultivos de frijol, por mamíferos silvestres, en el ejido Agua Blanca, Tacotalpa, Tabasco, México. Trabajo presentado en la semana de divulgación y video científico. Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa, México.

Müeller-Dombois, D., y H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York, EE. UU.

Muñoz, B. 2013. Distribución, abundancia y uso de hábitat del venado temazate (Mazama temama) en los bosques mesófilos de San Bartolo, Tutotepec, Hidalgo, México. Tesis de maestría. Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, México.

Naranjo, E. 2008. Uso y conservación de mamíferos en la selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Pp. 675-691 en Avances en el Estudio de los Mamíferos de México Vol. 2. (Lorenzo, C., E. Espinoza, y J. Ortega, eds.). Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C. Distrito Federal, México.

Neff, D. J. 1968. The Pellet-Group Count Technique for Big Game Trend, Census, and Distribution: A Review. The Journal of Wildlife Management 323:597-614.

Paredes, G. J. 2002. Manejo integral del venado Temazate Mazama americana en el zoólogico de Chapultepec. Trabajo presentado en el VIII Simposio sobre Venados en México “Ing. Jorge Villarreal Gonzálezâ€.

Peres, C. A. 2001. Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and hábitat fragmentation on Amazonian forest vertebrate. Conservation Biology 156:1490-1505.

Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652–661

Reyna-Hurtado, R. 2002. Hunting effects on the ungulate species in Calakmul, Forest, Mexico. Tesis de Maestría. University of Florida. Florida, EE.UU.

Reyna-Hurtado, R., Y G. W. Tanner. 2007. Ungulate relative abundance in hunted and non-hunted sites in Calakmul Forest Southern Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 163: 743-756.

Reyna-Hurtado, R., Y G. W. Tanner. 2010. Efecto de la perturbación humana en la abundancia relativa de ungulados en tres comunidades de la región de Calakmul, Campeche, México. Pp. 115-135 en Uso y manejo de fauna Silvestre en el norte de Mesoamérica (Guerra, M. M., S. Calmé, S. Gallina, y E. Naranjo, eds.). Secretaría de Educación de Veracruz. Xalapa, México.

Spotimage, SAGARPA, SIAP, ERMEXS, INEGI, Y SEMAR. 2011. Imagen de satélite Spot J-K: Proporcionada por la secretaría de marina.

Stat Soft, I. 2004. STATISTICA data analysis software system Version 7. Recuperado de www.statsoft.com

Teraoka, Y. 1996. An effective mensuration technique for multipurpose management using fish-eye photographic images. En Remote sensing and computer technology for natural resource assessment. (Saramaki, J., B. Koch, y H. G. Lund, eds.). University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry.

Thorton, D., L. C. Branch, y M. E. Sunquist. 2011. The relative influence of habitat loss and fragmentation: Do tropical mammals meet the temperate paradigm? Ecological Applications 216:2324-2333.

Urquiza-Haas, T., C. A. Peres, y P. M. Dolman. 2010. Large vertebrate responses to forest cover and hunting pressure in communal landholdings and protected areas of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Animal Conservation 14:271-282.

Usda, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, technical report PNW-GTR-351.

Villarreal-Espino, O. A., L. E. Campos-Armendia, T. A. Castillo-Martínez, I. Cortes-Mena, F. X. Plata-Pérez, y G. D. Mendoza-Martínez. 2008. Composición botánica de la dieta del venado temazate rojo Mazama temama, en la sierra nororiental del estado de Puebla. Universidad y Ciencia 24:183-188.

Villavicencio, M. S., y B. E. Pérez-Escandón. 2007. Flora útil de la Huasteca y la zona otomí-tepehua de Hidalgo. En estudio biológico de las áreas naturales y reserva de la biósfera del estado de Hidalgo (López-Escamilla, A. L. y G. Pulido-Flores, eds.). Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. Pachuca, México.

Weber, M. 2005. Ecology and conservation of sympatric tropical deer populations in the Greater Calakmul Region, south-eastern Mexico. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Durham. Durham, United Kingdom.

Weber, M. 2008. Un especialista, un generalista y un oportunista: uso de tipos de vegetación por tres especies de venados en Calakmul, Campeche. Pp. 483-496. En Avances en el Estudio de los Mamíferos de México Vol. 2. (Lorenzo, C., E. Espinoza, y J. Ortega, eds.). Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C. Distrito Federal, México.

Weber, M., y S. González. 2003. Latin american deer diversity and conservation: a review of status and distribution. Écoscience 104:443-454.

Weber, M. 2014. Temazates y venado cola blanca tropicales. En: Ecología y manejo de fauna silvestre en México (Valdez, R. y J. A Ortega-S, eds.). Colegio de postgraduados. Texcoco, México.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-28

Issue

Section

Special Contribution