Riqueza, distribución y conservación de los topos y las musarañas (Mammalia, Eulipotyphla) de México

Authors

  • Lázaro Guevara
  • Fernando A. Cervantes
  • Víctor Sánchez-Cordero

Keywords:

colecciones biológicas, distribución potencial, Insectivora, inventarios, mamíferos pequeños, field surveys, natural history collections, potential distribution, small mammals,

Abstract

Abstract. Introduction. Moles (Talpidae) and shrews (Soricidae) are the only representatives of the order Eulipotyphla in Mexico and they account for 7% of mammals in the country. Despite their richness, even basic aspects such as their species-level taxonomic knowledge and geographical distribution are still uncertain. The scarcity of such information implies that the biology and conservation status of eulipotyphlans are also unclear or unevaluated, which involves a serious impediment to the design of management strategies for a group that tends to be susceptible to climate change and impacts of anthropogenic habitat transformation. Here, we performed a comprehensive assessment of the current state of knowledge and threats to the survival of Mexican moles and shrews using information from natural history collections and spatial environmental data.Methods. We reviewed the available information in biological collections (Table 1), databases, and literature records of Mexican eulipotyphlans, and explored the historical bias in the collection of their specimens through time and space (Fig. 1). The potential distribution was estimated for nearly all moles and shrews recorded in Mexico, using ecological niche modeling. Finally, we calculated the extent of potential distribution for each species within protected areas and within the most threatened ecosystems in Mexico to identify the most vulnerable taxa.Results. The eulipotyphlan diversity of Mexico is represented by 3 species of moles and 36 of shrews. Of all these, 26 species (67%) are endemic to the country and 27 (69%) are listed in a risk category by Mexican government or global assessments (Table 2). Eleven taxa are known only from no more ten specimens or from very few collecting sites. The shrew Sorex stizodon has not been recorded for more than a century. Potential distributions of nine species were not estimated because they are represented by just a few locality records (< 5 localities). Potential distributions of eulipothyphlans cover 69% of Mexican territory, but only 10.4% is located in protected areas and 77% of taxa have suitable habitat within tropical evergreen forest and cloud forest, the most threatened ecosystems in the country (Tables 2-3; Figs. 2-4).Discussion and conclusions. This paper provides the first detailed documentation of available information on the taxonomy, nomenclature, distribution, and threats of moles and shrews in Mexico. Information from natural history collections corroborates the sparse and biased knowledge about the actual distribution of eulipotyphlans (Ramírez-Pulido et al. 2005; Carraway 2007). Our spatial analyses provide evidence that several species may be more endangered than suggested by global approaches (IUCN) and Mexican government legislation. Several species of moles and shrews may be represented sparsely in collections because of insufficient collecting. Our niche models projected onto a map to identify potential distribution areas should be used in directing field survey efforts and scientific collecting in order to increase the information regarding the actual distribution of several species. Additional occurrence records or absences and voucher specimens will provide data critical for effective future evaluation of their conservation status.

References

Anderson, R. P., e I. Gonzalez Jr. 2011. Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: an implementation with Maxent. Ecological Modelling 222: 2796-2811.

Asher, R. J., y K. M. Helgen. 2010. Nomenclature and placental mammal phylogeny. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10:102.

Carraway, L. N. 2007. Shrews (Eulypotyphla: Soricidae) of Mexico. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist 3:1-91.

Ceballos, G. 2007. Conservation priorities for mammals in megadiverse Mexico: the efficiency of reserve networks. Ecological Applications 17:569-578.

Ceballos, G., y J. Arroyo-Cabrales. 2013. Lista actualizada de los mamíferos de México 2012. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología, nueva época 2:27-80.

Ceballos, G., y D. Navarro. 1991. Diversity and conservation of Mexican mammals. Pp: 167- 198 en Latin American Mammalogy: history, diversity and conservation (Mares, M. A., y D. J. Schmidly, eds.). University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, EE.UU.

Cervantes, F. A., A. Montiel, y A. García. 2008. Shrews (Mammalia, Soricomorpha) from Colima, México. The Southwestern Naturalist 53:101-104.

Cervantes, F. A., y L. Guevara. 2010. Rediscovery of the critically endangered Nelson’s small-eared shrew (Cryptotis nelsoni), endemic to Volcán San Martín, Eastern México. Mammalian Biology 75:451-454.

Challenger, A., y J. Soberón. 2008. Los ecosistemas terrestres. Pp. 87-108 en Capital natural de México, vol. I: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Ciudad de México, México.

Choate, J. 1970. Systematics and Zoogeographic of Middle American shrews of the genus Cryptotis. University of Kansas Publications. Museum of Natural History 19:195-317.

Churchfield, S. 2002. Why are shrews so small? The costs and benefits of small size in northern temperate Sorex species in the context of foraging habits and prey supply. Acta Theriologica 47:169-184.

Douady, C. J., P. I. Chatelier, O. Madsen, W. W. de Jong, F. Catzeflis, M. S. Springer, y M. J. Stanhope. 2002. Molecular phylogenetic evidence confirming the Eulipotyphla concept and in support of hedgehogs as the sister group to shrews. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25:200-209.

Douady, C. J., y E. J. Douzery. 2003. Molecular estimation of eulipotyphlan divergence times and the evolution of “Insectivoraâ€. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28:285-296.

Escalante-Espinosa, T. 2003. Determinación de prioridades en las áreas de conservación para los mamíferos terrestres de México, empleando criterios biogeográficos. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Serie Zoología 74:211-237.

Esteva, M. E., F. A .Cervantes, S. Brant, y J. Cook. 2010. Molecular phylogeny of long-tailed shrews (genus Sorex) from México and Guatemala. Zootaxa 2615:47-65.

Goldman, E. A. 1951. Biological investigations in México. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 115. Washington, EE.UU.

Graham, C. H., S. Ferrier, F. Huettman, C. Moritz, y A. T. Peterson. 2004. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:497-503.

Guevara, L., H. E. Ramírez-Chaves, y F. A. Cervantes. 2011. Leucismo en la musaraña de orejas cortas Cryptotis mexicana (Mammalia: Soricomorpha), endémica de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82:731-733.

Guevara, L., C. Lorenzo, S. Ortega-García, y V. Sánchez-Cordero. 2014a. Noteworthy records of an endemic shrew from México (Mammalia, Soricomorpha, Cryptotis griseoventris), with comments on taxonomy. Mammalia 78: 405–408.

Guevara, L., V. Sánchez-Cordero, L. León-Paniagua, y N. Woodman. 2014b. A new species of small-eared shrew (Mammalia, Eulipotyphla, Cryptotis) from the Lacandona rainforest, México. Journal of Mammalogy 95:739-753.

Guevara, L., y F. A. Cervantes. 2014. Molecular systematics of small-eared shrews (Soricomorpha, Mammalia) within Cryptotis mexicanus species group from Mesoamérica. Acta Theriologica 59:233-242.

Hutterer, R. 2005. Order Soricomorpha. Pp. 220-311 in Mammal Species of the world: A taxonomic and geographic reference (Wilson, D. E., y D. M. Reeder, eds.). The John Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, EE.UU.

INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticay Geografía). 2014. Uso del Suelo y Vegetación escala 1:250,000, Serie V, Departamento de Uso del Suelo, Dirección General de Geografía, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, México. Sitio del INEGI en Internet: www.inegi.org.mx

IUCN(International Union for Conservation ofNature). 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1.

IUCN(International Union for Conservation ofNature), y UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2014. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC. Cambridge, United Kingdom.

ICZN(International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature). 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. Cuarta edicion International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. London, United Kingdom.

ICZN(International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature). 2006. Opinion 2164 (Case 3328). Didelphis Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia, Didelphidae): gender corrected to feminine, and Cryptotis Pomel, 1848 (Mammalia, Soricidae): gender fixed as masculine. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 63:282–283.

Jackson, C. R., y M. P. Robertson. 2011. Predicting the potential distribution of an endangered cryptic subterranean mammal from few occurrence records. Journal for Nature Conservation 19:87-94.

Maldonado, J. E. 1999. Family Talpidae. Pp: 53-55 en Mamíferos del noroeste de México (Álvarez-Castañeda S. T., y J. L. Patton, eds.). Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S. C. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.

Matson, J. O., y T. J. McCarthy. 2005. A new subspecies of Verapaz shrew (Sorex veraepacis) from Guatemala. Pp. 63-70 en Advances in the Biology of Shrews II (Merritt, J. F., S. Churchfield, R. Hutterer, y B. I. Sheftel, eds.). Special Publication of the International Society of Shrew Biologist. New York, EE.UU.

Merritt, J. F. 2010. The biology of small mammals. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, EE.UU.

Naranjo, E. J., y E. Espinoza. 2001. Los mamíferos de la reserva ecológica Huitepec, Chiapas, México. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología 5:58-67.

Nikaido, M., Y. Cao, M. Harada, N. Okada, y M. Hasegawa. 2003. Mitochondrial phylogeny of hedgehogs and monophyly of Eulipotyphla. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28:276-284.

PACC (Programade Acción ante el Cambio Climático en el Estado de Chiapas). 2011. Anexo técnico III Modelo de Deforestación del Estado de Chiapas. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente e Historia Natural. Disponible en: http://www2.inecc.gob.mx/sistemas/ peacc/descargas/paccc_chiapas.pdf. Consultado el 14 de mayo de 2013.

Patterson, B. D. 2002. On the continuing need for scientific collecting of mammals. Mastozoología Neotropical 9:253-262.

Pearson, R. G., C. J. Raxworthy, M. Nakamura, y A. T. Peterson. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 34:102-117.

Peterson, A. T., V. Sánchez-Cordero, J. Soberón, J. Bartley, R. W. Buddemeier, y A. Navarro- Sigüenza. 2001. Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican Cracidae. Ecological Modeling 144:21-30.

Peterson, A.T., J. Soberón, R. G. Pearson, R. P. Anderson, E. Martínez-Meyer, M. Nakamura, y M. B. Araújo. 2011. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton University Press. Princeton, EE.UU.

Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, y R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259.

Phillips, S. J., M. Dudík, J. Elith, C. H. Graham, A. Lehmann, A., J. Leathwick, y S. Ferrier. 2009. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications 19:181-197.

Ponce-Reyes, R., V. H. Reynoso-Rosales, J. E. M. Watson, J. VanDerWal, R. A. Fuller, R. L. Pressey, y H. P. Possingham. 2012. Vulnerability of cloud forest reserves in Mexico to climate change. Nature Climate Change 2:448-452.

Ramírez-Pulido, J., A. Castillo-Morales, A. Salame-Méndez, y A. Castro-Campillo. 2004. Características morfológicas y morfométricas de cinco especies de Cryptotis (Mammalia: Soricomorpha). Acta Zoológica Mexicana 20:9-37.

Ramírez-Pulido, J., A. Castillo-Morales, A. Salame-Méndez, A. Castro-Campillo, A., y N. González-Ruíz. 2005. Variación y distribución de Sorex (Mammalia: Soricomorpha) del centro de México. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural 3ra. Época 2:178-192.

Ramírez-Pulido, J., J. Arroyo-Cabrales, y N. González-Ruíz. 2008. Mamíferos. CD 1 en Catálogo taxonómico de especies de México, Vol. I: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad (Ocegueda, S., y J. Llorente-Bousquets, coord.). Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Ciudad de México, México.

Ramírez-Pulido, J., N. González-Ruiz, A. L. Gardner, y J. Arroyo-Cabrales. 2014. List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014. Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University 63:1-69.

Raxworthy, C. J., E. Martinez-Meyer, N. Horning, R. A. Nussbaum, G. E. Schneider, M. A. Ortega- Huerta, y A. T. Peterson. 2003. Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar. Nature 426:837-841.

Roca, A. L., G. Bar-Gal, K., E. Eizirik, K. M. Helgen, R. Maria, R., M. S. Springer, S. J. O´brien, y W. J. Murphy. 2004. Mesozoic origin for West Indian insectivores. Nature 429:649- 651.

Rocha, L. A., A. Aleixo, G. Allen, F. Almeda, C. C. Baldwin, M. V. Barclay, J. M. Bates, A. M. Bauer, F. Benzoni, C. M. Berns, M. L. Berumen, D. C. Blackburn, S. Blum, F. Bolaños, R. C. K. Bowie, R. Britz, R. M. Brown, C. D. Cadena, K. Carpenter, L. M. Ceríaco, P. Chakrabarty, G. Chaves, J. H. Choat, K. D. Clements, B. B. Collette, A. Collins, J. Coyne, J. Cracraft, T. Daniel, M. R. de Carvalho, K. de Queiroz, F. DiDario, R. Drewes, J. P. Dumbacher, A. Engilis Jr., M. V. Erdmann, W. Eschmeyer, C. R. Feldman, B. L. Fisher, J. FjeldsÃ¥, P. W. Fritsch, J. Fuchs, A. Getahun, A. Gill, M. Gomon, T. Gosliner, G. R. Graves, C. E. Griswold, R. Guralnick, K. Hartel, K. M. Helgen, H. Ho, D. T. Iskandar, T. Iwamoto, Z. Jaafar, H. F. James, D. Johnson, D. Kavanaugh, N. Knowlton, E. Lacey, H. K. Larson, P. Last, J. M. Leis, H. Lessios, J. Liebherr, M. Lowman, D. L. Mahler, V. Mamonekene, K. Matsuura, G. C. Mayer, H. Mays Jr., J. McCosker, R. W. McDiarmid, J. McGuire, M. J. Miller, R. Mooi, R. D. Mooi, C. Moritz, P. Myers, M. W. Nachman, R. A. Nussbaum, D. ÓFoighil, L. R. Parenti, J. F. Parham, E. Paul, G. Paulay, J. Pérez-Emán, A. Pérez-Matus, S. Poe, J. Pogonoski, D. L. Rabosky, J. E. Randall, J. D. Reimer, D. R. Robertson, M.-O. Rödel, M. T. Rodrigues, P. Roopnarine, L. Rüber, M. J. Ryan, F. Sheldon, G. Shinohara, A. Short, W. B. Simison, W. F. Smith-Vaniz, V. G. Springer, M. Stiassny, J. G. Tello, C. W. Thompson, T. Trnski, P. Tucker, T. Valqui, M. Vecchione, E. Verheyen, P. C. Wainwright, T. A. Wheeler, W. T. White, K. Will, J. T. Williams, G. Williams, E. O. Wilson, K. Winker, R. Winterbottom, y C. C. Witt. 2014. Specimen collection: an essential tool. Science 344:814-815.

Sánchez-Cordero, V., A. T. Peterson, y P. Escalante-Pliego. 2001. El modelado de la distribución de especies y la conservación de la diversidad biológica. Pp. 359–379 en Enfoques contemporáneos para el estudio de la biodiversidad (Hernández, H. M., A. N. García-Aldrete, F. Álvarez, y M. Ulloa, eds.). Ediciones Científicas Universitarias Fondo de Cultura Económica, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias, A.C., Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México.

Sánchez-Cordero, V., P. Illoldi-Rangel, M. Linaje, S. Sarkar, y A. T. Peterson. 2005. Deforestation and extant distributions of Mexican endemic mammals. Biological Conservation 126:465-473.

Sánchez-Cordero, V., P. Illoldi-Rangel, M. Linaje, T. Escalante, F. Figueroa, y S. Sarkar. 2009. Deforestation and biodiversity conservation in Mexico. Pp. 279-298 en Endangered Species: New Research (Columbus, A., y L. Kuznetsov, eds.). Nova Science Publishers. New Haven, EE.UU.

Schloss, C. A., T. A. Nuñez, y J. J. Lawler. 2012. Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:8606-8611.

Semarnat (Secretaríade Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales). 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para la inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Ciudad de México, México.

Simpson, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 85:1–350.

Soberón, J., y A. T. Peterson. 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2:1–10.

Stanhope, M. J., V. G. Waddell, O. Madsen, W. De Jong, S. B. Hedges, G. C. Cleven, K. Diana, y M. S. Springer. 1998. Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95:9967-9972.

STATSOFTINC. 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software system) version 7.1. Disponible en: http://www.statsoft.com/. Tulsa, EE.UU.

Symonds, M. R. 2005. Phylogeny and life histories of the ‘Insectivora’: controversies and consequences. Biological Reviews 80:93-128.

Trejo, I., E. Martínez-Meyer, E. Calixto-Pérez, S. Sánchez-Colón, R. Vázquez de laTorre, y L. Villers-Ruiz. 2011. Analysis of the effects of climate change on plant communities and mammals in México. Atmósfera 24:1-14.

Vázquez, L. B., C. G. Bustamante–Rodríguez, y D. G. Bahena-Arce. 2009. Area selection for conservation of Mexican mammals. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 32.1:29-39.

Yates, T. L., y J. Salazar-Bravo. 2005. A revision of Scapanus latimanus, with the revalidation of a species of Mexican mole. Pp. 479-496 en Contribuciones mastozoológicas en homenaje a Bernardo Villa (Sánchez-Cordero, V., y R. Medellín, eds.). Instituto de Biología e Instituto de Ecología, UNAM. Ciudad de México, México.

Warren, D. L., R. E. Glor, y M. Turelli. 2010. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33:607-611.

Warren, D. L., y S. N. Seifert. 2011. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications 21:335-342.

Wilson, D. E., y D. M. Reeder. 2011. Class Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758. In Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148:56-60.

Woodman, N., y D. A. Croft. 2005. Fossil shrews from Honduras and their significance for late glacial evolution in body size (Mammalia: Soricidae: Cryptotis). Fieldiana Geology 51:1–30.

Woodman, N. 2010. Two new species of shrews (Soricidae) from the western highlands of Guatemala. Journal of Mammalogy 91:566–579.

Woodman, N. 2012. Taxonomic status and relationships of Sorex obscurus parvidens Jackson, 1921, from California. Journal of Mammalogy 93:826-838.

Woodman, N., J. O. Matson, T. J. McCarthy, R. P. Eckerlin, W. Bulmer, y N. Ordóñez-Garza. 2012. Distributional records of shrews (Mammalia, Soricomorpha, Soricidae) from Northern Central America with the first record of Sorex from Honduras. Annals of Carnegie Museum 80:207–237.

Published

2014-12-30

Issue

Section

Special Contribution