THERYA NOTES 2023, Vol. 4 : 120-126 DOI: 10.12933/therya_notes-23-117 ISSN 2954-3614

Contribution to the knowledge on the diet of the collared peccary (Dicotyles tajacu) at the La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica

Aportes al conocimiento sobre la dieta del pecarí de collar (Dicotyles tajacu) en la Estación Biológica La Selva, Costa Rica

Marco Herminio Osorto-Nuñez1*, Luis Diego Alfaro Alvarado2, Federico A. Chinchilla Romero3, and Flávio H. Guimarães Rodrigues4

1Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra y el Mar, Instituto Internacional de Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre, Universidad Nacional. Calle 9 y Av. 1, 40101, Provincia de Heredia. Heredia, Costa Rica. E-mail: marco.osorto.nunez@est.una.ac.cr (MHO-N).

2Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra y el Mar, Escuela de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Nacional. Calle 9 y Av. 1, 40101, Provincia de Heredia. Heredia, Costa Rica. E-mail: luis.alfaro.alvarado@una.ac.cr (LDAA).

3Instituto Monteverde. 854R+763, 60109. Puntarenas, Costa Rica. E-mail: federicoeap@gmail.com (FACHR).

4Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte. Minas Gerais, Brazil. E-mail: rodriguesfhg@gmail.com (FHGR).

*Corresponding author

The diet of the collared peccary (Dicotyles tajacu) in the Neotropics is poorly known, although palm fruits are frequently reported. This study aimed to evaluate the diet of collared peccary groups at La Selva Biological Station (LSBS), Costa Rica. Between July and December 2021, 30 km of LSBS trails were traveled each month. A list of plant species consumed by peccaries was elaborated from direct visual observations. Samples of plant or fruit species collected in the field were identified at the family, genus, or species level. The diet of the collared peccary inhabiting the LSBS consisted of 38 species belonging to 18 families. The most consumed species belong to the family Arecaceae. Socratea exorrhiza, Ficus colubrinae, Dussia macroprophyllata, Sacoglottis trichogyna, Iriartea deltoidea, and Dipteryx panamensis were the predominant species in the peccary diet. The most important plant component was fruits. The dispersal mode of most species consumed was Endo-stricto. For 53 % of plant species consumed by peccaries have no information on their IUCN conservation status. Given the diverse diet of the collared peccary, conservation actions should consider the protection of primary forests as food sources, in addition to restoration projects of tropical ecosystems to promote tree species that provide fruits attractive to peccaries.

Key words: Eating habits; fruits; palms; saino; wet tropical forest.

La información disponible sobre la dieta del pecarí de collar (Dicotyles tajacu) en el neotrópico es escasa, aunque se sabe que los frutos de palma son reportados con frecuencia. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar la dieta de los grupos de pecaríes de collar en la Estación Biológica La Selva (EBLS), Costa Rica. Entre julio y diciembre de 2021 se recorrieron 30 km por mes en los senderos de la EBLS. Mediante el método de observación directa se realizó un listado de especies de plantas consumidas por los pecaríes. Las muestras de las especies de plantas o frutos colectadas en campo se identificaron a nivel de familia, género y/o especie. La dieta del pecarí de collar en la EBLS estuvo conformada por 38 especies, pertenecientes a 18 familias. Las especies de la familia Arecaceae fueron las de mayor consumo. Socratea exorrhiza, Ficus colubrinae, Dussia macroprophyllata, Sacoglottis trichogyna, Iriartea deltoidea y Dipteryx panamensis fueron las especies más consumidas. El componente de mayor importancia fueron los frutos. El modo de dispersión de la mayoría de las especies consumidas fue Endo-stricto. El 53 % de las especies de las plantas consumidas no presenta información sobre su categoría de conservación según la UICN. Dada la diversidad en la dieta del pecarí de collar, las acciones de conservación deben considerar la protección de bosques primarios como fuentes de alimento, así como proyectos de restauración de ecosistemas tropicales en función de promover especies de árboles que brindan frutos atractivos para los pecaríes.

Palabras claves: Bosque tropical húmedo; frutos; hábitos alimentarios; palmas; saíno.

© 2023 Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, www.mastozoologiamexicana.org

The collared peccary (Dycotyles tajacu) is a medium-sized, compact-bodied ungulate (Aranda 1994) belonging to the family Tayassuidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) and previously considered in the genus Tayassu (Mayer and Wetzel 1987; Torrealba-Suárez 1993; Sowls 1997). This species inhabits a wide variety of biomes and is listed as Least Concern according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (Gongora et al. 2011). Its current distribution stretches from southwestern United States of America to the northern-central area of Argentina (Gasparini et al. 2013; Ontiveros et al. 2020), with stable distribution ranges of between 38 ha and 685 ha (Torrealba-Suárez 1993; Carrillo et al. 2002; Beck 2006). These ungulates are components of the dynamics of Neotropical forests as key herbivores governing plant diversity, spatial distribution, and demography (Clark and Clark 1989; Torrealba-Suárez 1993; Roldán and Simonetti 2001; Beck 2005; ; ).

The diet of collared peccaries is one of the main research topics among the scholars studying these ungulates since it plays a major role in the reproductive success and evolutionary adaptation of the species, as well as in its ecological relationships with other animal and plant species (Pérez-Cortez and Reyna-Hurtado 2008). In the Neotropics, peccaries are generally frugivorous, and their diet varies according to the habitat (Beck 2005). Throughout their distribution, these ungulates consume up to 128 species of plants belonging to 38 families, preferring palm fruits of the family Arecaceae (Kiltie and Terborgh 1983; Beck 2005, 2006, 2007; Keuroghlian and Eaton 2008; Queenborough et al. 2012), in addition to other species of the families Fabaceae, Sapotaceae, and Moraceae, among others (Beck 2005).

In this sense, peccaries consume a wide variety of plant foods such as pulp, roots, tubers (Torrealba-Suárez 1993; Altrichter et al. 2000; Beck 2005, 2006; Romero et al. 2013), and palm seeds (Queenborough et al. 2012). Their diet also includes animals, including invertebrates, frogs, snakes, turtles, fish, eggs, lizards, birds, and small rodents (Romero et al. 2013). In places with prolonged droughts, collared peccaries have been observed consuming mainly succulents, especially prickley-pear cactus, Opuntia lindheimeri, to meet their water and energy needs (Gallagher et al. 1984; Corn and Warren 1985), as well as cactus roots and pulp (Desbiez et al. 2009).

The La Selva Biological Station (LSBS) is under protection, and surveillance actions have been implemented, fostering the growth of local peccary populations since the 1980s (Michel et al. 2014; Romero et al. 2013). In addition, the National Wildlife Conservation Act prohibits the wildlife hunting (MINAE 2008), contributing to the abundance of this species. In LSBS, peccaries are easily observed on forest trails and near laboratories and office areas due to the abundance of food resources such as fig (Ficus colubrinae), chonta or walking palm (Socratea exorrhiza), bombona or pona palm (Iriartea deltoidea) and Philodendron sp. (Romero et al. 2013). Among these resources, palm fruits have been frequently reported as part of the collared peccary diet, and although it consumes a wide variety of plant species in Neotropical forests, the abundance of each species is less well-known (Beck 2005; Queenborough et al. 2012). This study aimed to evaluate the diet of collared peccary groups at La Selva Biological Station (LSBS) in Costa Rica.

The LSBS is located in the province of Heredia on the Caribbean slope of northern Costa Rica and is physically connected with the Braulio Carrillo National Park (Torrealba-Suárez 1993). It comprises an area of 1,600 ha, of which 73 % is wet tropical forest (wtf–T; Hartshorn 1983), and the remaining area comprises experimental forest plantations (Figure 1; Arroyo-Arce et al. 2013). The temperature ranges between 24.7 ºC and 27.1 °C, with maxima between 30 ºC and 34 °C, and the mean annual rainfall varies between 3,800 mm and 4,000 mm (Robinson et al. 2018; Armstrong et al. 2020), with a period of low rainfall between January and April (Clark et al. 2013; Armstrong et al. 2020) and the highest precipitation between June and November (McClearn et al. 2016). The vegetation consists of different successional stages and the topography goes from flat to undulating (Oviedo-Pérez 2008; Arroyo-Arce et al. 2013; Romero et al. 2013; Raich et al. 2014).

The study on the diet of peccaries was conducted from July 9 to December 9, 2021. All the EBLS trails were traveled, with intervals of 350 m to 6 km between hikes. Trails included primary forest, secondary forest, managed forest, building areas, abandoned agroforestry, arboretum, clean wooded marshland, successional plots, grasslands with and without trees, forest plantations of native species, the mature forest ecological reserve, and urbanized areas. Hikes were walked over 9 hours between 8:00 and 17:00 hr, at 1 km/hr, covering an average of 30 km per month. When coming across a solitary peccary or a group of peccaries, we directly observed the nearest individual every 5 min (Figure 2a, b). We recorded the consumption of fruits, vegetative parts (leaves and stems), leaf litter or biomass in the soil, animals (invertebrates and small vertebrates), the frequency with which each food type was consumed. Samples of the species of plants or fruits consumed by peccaries were collected and identified at the family, genus, or species level with the assistance of LSBS staff.

A list of plant species consumed by peccaries was elaborated accompanied by their IUCN conservation status. Besides, the dispersal category of each was also noted, considering the 5 dispersal categories defined by Hawes et al. (2020): a) Endo-stricto or “true endozoochory”, where seeds are dispersed by animals, either through seed ingestion (endozoochory) or via accumulation (synzoochory); b) Endo-lato or “possible endozoochory”, where, in addition to dispersal by animals, this can also occur through other means such as water transport (hydrochory) or auto-dispersal (autochory); c) Synzoochory, where seeds are dispersed by animals through seed accumulation, although it also considers other means such as autochory, hydrochory, and ant dispersal (myrmecoria); d) Others: dispersal that does not involve animals, including anemochory (wind dispersal), autochory, baracory (dispersal through gravity), and hydrochory; and, e) no information available.

Finally, the most frequently consumed plant species were determined according to three categories: fruits, leaves, and flowers. The descriptive analysis was performed in Python 3.9 (Python Software Foundation 2023).

In the LSBS, the diet of the collar peccary consists of 38 species of plants belonging to 18 families (Table 1). The plant species with the highest frequency of consumption belonged to the families Arecaceae (31 %), followed by Araceae (10 %) and Moraceae, Fabaceae, Sapotaceae, Myristicaceae, Phytolaccaceae and Piperaceae (5 % each). The species consumed most frequently by peccaries were Socratea exorrhiza (18 observations), Ficus colubrinae (14 observations), Dussia macroprophyllata, Sacoglottis trichogyna, Iriartea deltoidea (3 observations each), and Dipteryx panamensis (2 observations; Table 1; Figure 3). The dominant components in the diet of collared peccaries were fruits (77 %), followed by leaves (20 %) and flowers (3 %). The fruits most consumed by peccaries in building areas were Ficus colubrinae.

The dispersal mode of most species consumed by peccaries was Endo-stricto (60.53 %), followed by synzoochory (18.42 %), Endo-lato (2.63 %), no information available (10.53 %), and others (7.89 %). According to IUCN conservation categories, 53 % of the plant species consumed by peccaries are not listed, 37 % are listed as Least Concern, 5 % Endangered, 2.5 % Vulnerable, and the rest are classified as Near Threatened (2.5 %).

Most of the species consumed by collared peccaries in the LSBS belong to the family Arecaceae, compared to fruits and seeds of other families (Beck 2006). This is because the fruits and seeds of palm trees are rich in carbohydrates, which provide energy, and are available throughout the year, even drought periods when fruits of other species are scarce (Beck 2005, 2006).

With regard to the species consumed, we concluded that D. tajacu consumes a few species when they are abundant. This was the case of S. exhorriza, the species most consumed by peccaries in the LSBS; in this zone, it was previously reported that peccaries consume the roots of this species, mainly when fruits are scarce (Méndez-Figueroa 2014; Ávalos et al. 2016).

On the other hand, F. colubrinae, the second most consumed species by D. tajacu in this study, is commonly found in areas of the LSBS with buildings. It produces fruits in all seasons so that these are readily available for consumption by peccaries throughout the year (Quesada et al. 1997). It should be noted that the family Araceae includes toxic species such as Philondendron spp. (Escobar 1972), which were consumed by peccaries in a smaller proportion. This may be related to the evolutionary adaptation of these animals, which allows feeding on plant tissues of species containing high amounts of compounds, only digestible through bacterial fermentation (Sowls 1997; Altrichter et al. 2000). In this sense, the number of plant species used by peccaries in the LSBS demonstrates that the collared peccary is an opportunistic species capable of using fruits and seeds across a wide morphological and taxonomic range (Sowls 1997; Keuroghlian et al. 2004; Beck 2005).

Our results are similar to those reported by Beck (2005) in previous studies in the Neotropics, who also found that peccaries fed preferentially on fruits of the family Arecaceae, although in a lower percentage (19 %) than the frequency reported in this note. Beck (2005) also reported the consumption of fruits of the families Fabaceae, Sapotaceae, and Moraceae in higher frequencies than those reported in the present study. With respect to the main components in the diet of the collared peccary in the LSBS, Torrealba-Suárez (1993) reported 53 % fruit consumption, while Méndez-Figueroa (2014) noted that leaves were the plant tissue most consumed (58 %), followed by fruits (31 %); these percentages differ from the figures reported herein.

As expected, endozoochory is the dispersal mode of most species consumed by peccaries in LSBS. The role of peccaries in forest regeneration in the Neotropics has been demonstrated in previous studies, both within the LSBS and elsewhere, since it has been observed that seeds of different species are resistant to the digestive process of peccaries (Beck 2005; Platt et al. 2014) and have successfully germinated in stool samples. For example, Beck (2005) identified seeds of Ficus sp., Brosimun spp., Phytolacca dioica, and Dipteryx panamensis in collared peccary feces. Other authors also reported the presence of seeds of Socratea sp. (Kiltie 1981), Ficus spp. (Martínez-Romero and Mandujano 1995), Brosimum alicastrum, Piper sp., and Chamaedorea sp. (Pérez-Cortez and Reyna-Hurtado 2008).

Stomach analyses of collared peccaries have revealed the presence of large intact seeds of Socratea sp. and I. deltoidea, but no germination tests have been performed on them (Beck 2005). According to Kiltie (1981), peccaries thoroughly chew their food and rarely function as effective dispersers of large seeds. However, we suggest carrying out germination studies of seeds present in peccary feces to gain a better understanding of their role as seed dispersers (e.g., Liu et al. 2004; Myers et al. 2004; Beck 2005). The potential of the collared peccary as a seed disperser is clear, as in the case of large seeds of S. exhorriza, D. panamensis, B. alicastrum, and I. deltoidea, and small seeds of Phytolacca rivinoides and F. colubrinae, based on the frequency of consumption reported in the present study and previous research (Kiltie 1981; Martínez-Romero and Mandujano 1995; Beck 2005; Pérez-Cortez and Reyna-Hurtado 2008).

Our results show that, in the LSBS, the diet of the collared peccary includes 38 plant species, mainly of the family Arecaceae, with fruits being the plant component most consumed in all species. Therefore, conservation actions for this ungulate species should consider restoring forest ecosystems and protecting primary forests as these represent their main food source. Finally, the connectivity between LSBS and other forest fragments should be promoted through local biological corridors to facilitate the natural restoration of plants important in the diet of peccaries, given its ecological importance in wet tropical forests.

Acknowledgements

To German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for the scholarship granted to M. H. Osorto-Nuñez, to study the Master’s degree in Wildlife Conservation and Management. To Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (UNA) for the funding granted for materials and logistics. To the Organization for Tropical Studies (OTS) and Glaxo Centro America Fellowships (GlaxoSmithKline) for the funds to carry out the field work at the La Selva Biological Station. To Idea Wild by the research equipment provided. To O. Vargas for assistance in identifying plant species. To three anonymous reviewers who contributed to improve the manuscript. M. E. Sánchez-Salazar translated the manuscript into English.

Literature cited

Altrichter, M., et al. 2000. Dieta estacional del Tayassu pecari (Artiodactyla: Tayassuidae) en el Parque Nacional Corcovado, Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 48:689-702.

Aranda, M. 1994. Importancia de los pecaríes (Tayassu spp.) en la alimentación del jaguar (Panthera onca). Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie) 62:11-22.

Armstrong, A. H., et al. 2020. A multi-scaled analysis of forest structure using individual-based modeling in a Costa Rican rainforest. Ecological Modelling 43:109226.

Arroyo-Arce, S., et al. 2013. Uso de dos tipos de bosque por saínos (Pecari tajacu) en estación La Selva, Costa Rica. Cultura Científica 11:32-39.

Ávalos, G., et al. 2016. Quantification of browsing damage to the stilt root cone of Socratea exorrhiza (Arecaceae) by Collared Peccaries (Pecari tajacu, Artiodactyla: Tayassuidae) at La Selva, Costa Rica. Brenesia 85–86:30-37.

Beck, H. 2005. Seed predation and dispersal by peccaries throughout the neotropics and its consequences: a review and synthesis. Pp. 77-115 in Seed fate: predation, dispersal, and seedling establishment (Forget, P. M., J. E. Lambert, P. E. Hulme, and S. B. Vander Wall, eds.). CABI Publishing. Wallingford, United Kingdom.

Beck, H. 2006. A review of peccary-palm interactions and their ecological ramifications across the Neotropics. Journal of Mammalogy 87:519-530.

Beck, H. 2007. Synergistic impacts of ungulates and falling palm fronds on saplings in the Amazon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23:599-602.

Briceño-Méndez, M., et al. 2017. Availability of two species of fruits and their influence on the social structure of Tayassu pecari and Dicotyles tajacu. Therya 8:193-198.

Carrillo, E., et al. 2002. Movements and activities of white-lipped peccaries in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica. Biological Conservation 108:317-324.

Clark, D. A., et al. 2013. Field-quantified responses of tropical rainforest aboveground productivity to increasing CO2 and climatic stress, 1997–2009. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 118:783-794.

Clark, D. B., and D. A. Clark. 1989. The role of physical damage in the seedling mortality regime of a neotropical rain forest. Oikos 55:225-230.

Corn, J. L., and R. J. Warren. 1985. Seasonal food habits of the collared peccary in South Texas. Journal of Mammalogy 66:155-159.

Desbiez, A. L. J., et al. 2009. Niche partitioning among white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari), collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu), and feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Journal of Mammalogy 90:119-128.

Escobar, N. 1972. Flora tóxica de Panamá. EUPAN. Panamá, Panamá.

Gallagher, J. F., L.W. Varner., and W.E. Grant. 1984. Nutrition of the collared peccary in South Texas. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48:749-761.

Gasparini, G. M., et al. 2013. The Chacoan peccary, Catagonus wagneri (Mammalia, Tayassuidae), in the late Pleistocene (northern Uruguay, South America): Paleoecological and Paleobiogeographic considerations. Historical Biology 25:679-690.

Gongora, J., et al. 2011. Collared peccary. In: UICN, 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/41777/10562361. Accessed on October 10, 2022.

Hartshorn, G. S. 1983. Plants. Pp. 118-158 in Costa Rican Natural History (Janzen, D., ed.). The University Chicago Press. Chicago, U.S.A.

Hawes, J. E., et al. 2020. A large-scale assessment of plant dispersal mode and seed traits across human-modified Amazonian forests. Journal of Ecology 108:1373-1385.

Keuroghlian, A., and D. P. Eaton. 2008. Fruit availability and peccary frugivory in an isolated Atlantic Forest fragment: effects on peccary ranging behavior and habitat use. Biotropica 40:62-70.

Keuroghlian, A., et al. 2004. Area use by white-lipped and collared peccaries (Tayassu pecari and Tayassu tajacu) in a tropical forest fragment. Biological Conservation 120:411-425.

Kiltie, R. A. 1981. Stomach contents of rain forest peccaries (Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari). Biotropica 13:234-236.

Kiltie, R. A., and J. Terborgh. 1983. Observations on the behavior of rain forest peccaries in Perú: Why do white-lipped peccaries form herds? Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 62:241-255.

Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía (MINAE). 2008. Ley de conservación de la vida silvestre N° 7317, Que establece las regulaciones sobre la vida silvestre que viven en condiciones naturales, temporales o permanentes en el territorio nacional. Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía. Costa Rica. Accessed on December 4, 2008.

Liu, H., et al. 2004. Seed dispersal by the Florida box turtle (Terrapene carolina bauri) in pine rockland forests of the lower Florida Keys, United States. Oecologia 138:539-546.

Martínez-Romero, L. E., and S. Mandujano. 1995. Hábitos alimentarios del pecarí de collar (Pecari tajacu) en un bosque tropical caducifolio de Jalisco, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie) 64:1-20.

Mayer, J. J., and R. M. Wetzel. 1987. Tayassu pecari. Mammalian Species 293:1-7.

Myers, J. A., et al. 2004. Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: Implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139:35-44.

McClearn, D., et al. 2016. The caribbean lowland evergreen moist and wet forests. Pp. 527-587 in Costa Rica ecosystems (Kepelle, M., ed.). University of Chicago Press. Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Méndez-Figueroa, M. 2014. Densidad, relación con la vegetación, daños a cultivos agrícolas e interacción humanos-saínos (Pecari tajacu) en la Estación Biológica y fincas aledañas. Graduate Thesis. Universidad Nacional. Heredia, Costa Rica.

Michel, N. L., T. W. Sherry and W. P. Carson. 2014. The omnivorous collared peccary negates an insectivore-generated trophic cascade in Costa Rican wet tropical forest understorey. Journal of Tropical Ecology 30:1-11.

Ontiveros, T. Y., et al. 2020. Confirmación de la presencia de pecarí de collar (Pecari tajacu) en el Parque Provincial Ischigualasto (San Juan, República Argentina). Notas Sobre Mamíferos Sudamericanos 2:1-6.

Oviedo-Pérez, P. 2008. Distribución espacial de tinámidos (Tinamiformes) en la Estación Biológica La Selva, Costa Rica. Uniciencia 22:93-97.

Paine, C. E. T., and H. Beck. 2007. Seed predation by neotropical rain forest mammals increases diversity in seedling recruitment. Ecology 88:3076-3087.

Pérez-Cortez, S., and R. Reyna-Hurtado. 2008. La dieta de los pecaríes (Pecari tajacu y Tayassu pecari) en la región de Calakmul, Campeche, México. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología (Nueva Época) 12:17-42.

Platt, S. G., et al. 2014. Consumption of desert gourds by collared peccary suggests the fruit is not an ecological anachronism. The Southwestern Naturalist 59:141-144.

Python Software Foundation. 2023. Python language reference, version 3.9. https://docs.python.org/3.9/. Accessed on July 11, 2022.

Queenborough, S. A., et al. 2012. Palms, peccaries, and perturbations: widespread effects of small-scale disturbance in tropical forests. BMC Ecology 12:1-15.

Quesada, F., et al. 1997. Árboles de la península de Osa, primera edición. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad. Heredia, Costa Rica.

Raich, J. W., et al. 2014. Aboveground tree growth varies with belowground carbon allocation in a tropical rainforest environment. PLoS One 9:e100275.

Robinson, C., et al. 2018. Topography and three-dimensional structure can estimate tree diversity along a tropical elevational gradient in Costa Rica. Remote Sensing 10:629.

Roldán, A. I., and J. A. Simonetti. 2001. Plant-mammal interactions in Tropical Bolivian Forests with different hunting pressures. Conservation Biology 15:617-623.

Romero, A., et al. 2013. Group dynamics, behavior, and current and historical abundance of peccaries in Costa Rica’s Caribbean lowlands. Journal of Mammalogy 94:771-791.

Sowls, L. 1997. Javelinas and other peccaries: their biology, management, and use. University Press. Texas, U.S.A.

Torrealba-Suárez, I. M. 1993. Ecología de los grupos de saínos (Tayassu tajacu) y daños que ocasionan en los cultivos vecinos a La Estación Biológica La Selva, Costa Rica. Graduate Thesis. Universidad Nacional. Heredia, Costa Rica.

Associated editor: Gloria Tapia Ramírez.

Submitted: May 18, 2023; Reviewed: July 19, 2023.

Accepted: August 1, 2023; Published on line: August 21, 2023.

Figure 1. La Selva Biological Station, Puerto Viejo, Sarapiquí, Costa Rica.

Figure 2. Collared peccaries, Dicotyles tajacu, feeding at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. a) A group of peccaries, b) a solitary peccary.

Table 1. List of species consumed by Dicotyles tajacu at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica.

Species

Type of organism

Dispersal Category

Conservation status according to the IUCN Red List

Family Araceae

Philodendron alliodorum

Bush

Others

No information

Philodendron jodavisianum 

Creeper

Others

No information

Philodendron radiatum

Creeper

Synzoochory

No information

Philodendron sp.

Bush

Synzoochory

No information

Family Arecaceae

Asterogyne martiana

Palm

Endo-stricto

No information

Astrocaryum alatum

Palm

Synzoochory

Near threatened

Astrocaryum confertum

Palm

Synzoochory

Endangered

Bactris coloradonis

Palm

Endo-stricto

No information

Bactris gasipaes

Palm

Endo-stricto

No information

Bactris longiseta

Palm

Endo-stricto

Endangered

Calyptrogyne ghiesbreghtiana

Palm

No information

No information

Chamaedorea pinnatifrons

Palm

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Iriartea deltoidea

Palm

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Socratea exorrhiza

Palm

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Synechanthus warscewiczianus

Palm

No information

No information

Welfia regia

Palm

Endo-stricto

No information

Family Burceraceae

Protium pittieri

Tree

Endo-stricto

Vulnerable

Family Fabaceae

Dipteryx panamensis

Tree

Endo-stricto

No information

Dussia macroprophyllata

Tree

Endo-lato

Least concern

Family Humiriaceae

Sacoglottis trichogyna

Tree

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Family Lamiaceae

Aegiphila falcata

Bush

No information

Least concern

Family Malvaceae

Pachira aquatica

Tree

Synzoochory

Least concern

Family Menispermaceae

Abuta panamensis

Liana

Synzoochory

No information

Family Moraceae

Brosimum alicastrum

Tree

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Ficus colubrinae

Tree

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Family Myristicaceae

Virola sebifera

Tree

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Virola koschnyi

Tree

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Family Nyctaginaceae

Neea laetevirens

Bush

Endo-stricto

No information

Family Passifloraceae

Passiflora arbelaezii

Liana

Synzoochory

No information

Family Phytolaccaceae

Trichostigma polyandrum

Bush

Endo-stricto

No information

Phytolacca rivinoides

Bush

Endo-stricto

No information

Family Piperaceae

Piper sp.

Bush

Endo-stricto

No information

Piper sp.

Bush

Endo-stricto

No information

Family Primulaceae

Clavija costaricana

Bush

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Family Rubiaceae

Faramea suerrensis

Bush

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Family Sapindaceae

Paullinia granatensis

Liana

No information

No information

Family Sapotaceae

Chrysophyllum venezuelanense

Tree

Endo-stricto

Least concern

Family Solanaceae

Merinthopodium neuranthum

Bush

Others

No information

Figure 3. Number of observations for each plant species consumed by Dicotyles tajacu at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica.