THERYA NOTES 2023, Vol. 4 : 55-59 DOI: 10.12933/therya_notes-23-106 ISSN 2954-3614

Distribution extension of a rare species, Eumops auripendulus in the province of Santa Fe, Argentina

Extensión de la distribución de una especie rara, Eumops auripendulus en la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina

María Eugenia Montani1,2,3,4*, Germán Saigo1,2,4, and Irene M. Villa2,4

1Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales “Dr. Ángel Gallardo”. San Lorenzo 1949, C. P. 2000, Rosario. Santa Fe, Argentina. E-mail: euge.montani@gmail.com (MEM); germansaigo@gmail.com (GS).

2Fundación “Programa de Conservación de los Murciélagos de Argentina” (PCMA). Miguel Lillo 205, C. P. 4000, San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán, Argentina. E-mail: irenevmaria@gmail.com (IMV).

3Instituto de Investigaciones de Biodiversidad Argentina (PIDBA). Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Miguel Lillo 205, C. P. 4000, San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán, Argentina.

4Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Campo Experimental Villarino, C. P. S2125ZAA, Zavalla. Santa Fe, Argentina.

*Corresponding author

The presence of Eumops auripendulus (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in the province of Santa Fe, Argentina, is recorded. Until now, this species in Santa Fe was known from a single record from Esperanza in 1978. A new specimen was obtained in the town of Florencia, located about 400 km NE of Esperanza, near the border with the province of Chaco. This new record corresponds to an animal that was found dead and sent to the Laboratorio Central de la Dirección General de Bioquímica y Farmacia of Santa Fe in 2019 as part of the rabies virus surveillance protocol. The species was identified based on its morphometric variables and its general aspect. On the other hand, its geographical location was plotted on a map together with the rest of the records of this species in the country; the ecoregional context was also considered. This new record confirms the current presence of the species in the province and helps to clarify its geographic distribution range as well as its ecological preferences, considering that both localities are situated in different ecoregions: Espinal (Esperanza) and Humid Chaco (Florencia). It is important to mention that E. auripendulus has been poorly studied in Argentina, being known only from 10 records in 3 provinces: Chaco, Misiones, and Santa Fe.

Key words: Argentina; New record; Santa Fe; Shaw’s Mastiff Bat.

Se registra la presencia de Eumops auripendulus (Chiroptera, Molossidae) en la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. Hasta ahora, esta especie era conocida en la provincia de Santa Fe a partir de un solo registro en la localidad de Esperanza en 1978. Se obtuvo un nuevo ejemplar en la localidad de Florencia, ubicada a unos 400 km al NE de Esperanza, cerca del límite con la provincia del Chaco. Este nuevo registro corresponde a un animal encontrado muerto y enviado al Laboratorio Central de la Dirección General de Bioquímica y Farmacia de Santa Fe en 2019 como parte del protocolo de vigilancia del virus de la rabia. La especie fue identificada con base en sus variables morfométricas y por su aspecto general. Por otro lado, la ubicación geográfica del registro fue trazada en un mapa junto al resto de los registros de la especie en el país; también se consideró el contexto ecorregional. Este nuevo registro confirma la presencia actual de la especie en la provincia y ayuda a esclarecer su rango de distribución geográfica así como sus preferencias ecológicas, considerando que ambas localidades se encuentran en diferentes ecorregiones: Espinal (Esperanza) y Chaco Húmedo (Florencia). Es importante mencionar que E. auripendulus ha sido poco estudiada en Argentina, siendo conocida a partir de 10 registros en 3 provincias: Chaco, Misiones y Santa Fe.

Palabras claves: Argentina; nuevo registro; Santa Fe; moloso oscuro.

© 2023 Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, www.mastozoologiamexicana.org

Santa Fe province occupies the central region of Argentina. It covers an area of 132,638 km2 and includes 5 ecoregions: Humid and Dry Chaco, Espinal, Pampas, and Delta and Islands of Paraná (Burkart et al. 1999; Biasatti et al. 2015). Out of the 69 species of bats recorded in Argentina (Barquez and Díaz 2020; Montani et al. 2021; Novaes et al. 2022), 28 (40 %) are found in the province of Santa Fe (Barquez and Díaz 2020; Montani et al. 2021; Pavé et al. 2021; Pavé and Gavazza 2022). 

Among the molossid bats, the genus Eumops Miller, 1906, is the most diverse in the New World, exhibiting many shapes and sizes (Eger 1977) in its 17 recognized species (Gregorin et al. 2016). Sixteen of these are found in the Neotropics (Eger 2007; Díaz et al. 2021), all of them are fast-flying insectivorous species that forage above the forest canopy (Sodré et al. 2008), and occupies a wide range of environments, from natural to urban (Eger 1977; Best et al. 2002).

Within the genus Eumops, species can be divided into small, medium, and large, according to their body size (Gregorin et al. 2016). In Argentina, this genus is represented by 6 species; small: E. bonariensis (Peters, 1874) and E. patagonicus Thomas, 1924; medium: E. auripendulus (Shaw, 1800) and E. glaucinus (Wagner, 1843); large: E. dabbenei Thomas, 1914 and E. perotis (Schinz, 1821).

Eumops auripendulus is distributed in Argentina, Brasil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Paraguay, Perú, Surinam, and Venezuela (Díaz et al. 2021). Two subspecies are currently recognized, E. a. auripendulus distributed from central Bolivia northward to Central America, and E. a. major, in eastern Brazil, southern Paraguay, and northeastern Argentina (Eger 1977, 2007; Barquez et al. 1999, Best et al. 2002; Barquez and Díaz 2020). 

In Argentina, Eumops auripendulus is poorly known due to the scarcity of available data, with only 10 historical records from 3 provinces: Chaco, Misiones, and Santa Fe, comprising 3 ecoregions, respectively: Delta and Islands of Paraná, Paranaense Forests, and Espinal (Burkart et al. 1999; Morello et al. 2018). In Chaco it was collected in the town of Resistencia in 1937 (n = 1; pers. comm. I. Olivares); in Misiones (n = 8), 2 specimens in Campo Viera locality in 1968, 1 specimen from an unknown locality in 1968, 1 specimen in Bompland locality in 1969, 3 specimens in Colonia Mártires locality in 1969, and 1 specimen in El Dorado locality (prior to 1974; pers. comm. S. Bogan and B. K. Lim); and 1 specimen in the town of Esperanza in Santa Fe (n = 1; pers. comm. P. Teta; Figure 1).

Besides its medium body size within the genus, there are other morphological features that characterize this species. Ranging between 61 to 69 mm (Barquez et al. 1999), the length of the forearm of E. auripendulus is similar to that of the other medium-sized species present in Argentina, such as E. glaucinus (between 61-68 mm), but the darker pelage and membranes of the former, easily differentiates it from the latter. The dorsal pelage is blackish brown or blackish cinnamon, with hairs lighter at their bases (Barquez et al. 1999; Best et al. 2002).

The previous locality cited of E. auripendulus in Santa Fe province (Esperanza) corresponds to the Espinal ecoregion, characterized by a flat to slightly undulating lowland landscape, composed of low and non-stratified xerophytic forests, savannas, and grasslands, which have now been largely replaced by croplands. This zone of the ecoregion has a humid temperate plain climate, characterized by abrupt weather changes, and cold air saturated with moisture (Burkart et al. 1999; Matteucci 2018).

The specimen was collected on May 14, 1978, by the Instituto de Virología de Córdoba and deposited in the Mammals collection of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (MACN-Ma 16547; Teta and Rodríguez 2021).

Eumops auripendulus was globally categorized as Least Concern (LC; Barquez et al. 2015), while at local scale, the species was categorized as Data Deficient (Díaz and Barquez 2019), due to the scarcity of records as mentioned above.

The specimen was collected on December 3, 2019 by personnel of the Central Laboratory of the Dirección General de Bioquímica y Farmacia of Santa Fe and donated to the Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales “Dr. Ángel Gallardo” (MG-ZV-M), Rosario, Argentina. The specimen was stored in the mammal collection in accordance with a license to collect dead animal and their parts granted by the Ministerio de Ambiente y Cambio Climático of Santa Fe (Resolution Nº 466/2019). It was preserved as stuffed skin, skull, and complete skeleton.

Because the specimen was previously dissected to extract brain samples for rabies virus analysis, some measurements of the skull, such as the height of the sagittal crest, were missing. External and cranial measurements were taken following Barquez et al. (1999, 2021), systematic identification followed Díaz et al. (2021) and description followed Barquez et al. (1999) and Best et al. (2002).

The new record of E. auripendulus comes from Florencia city (28º 3’ 0” S; 59º 13’ 12” W; 54 m). This locality is included in the Humid Chaco ecoregion (Burkart et al. 1999), subdivision Complejo Dorsal Oriental. The climate is sub-humid with low thermal amplitude. The annual mean precipitation ranges from 1000 - 1050 mm and the annual mean temperature is 18 °C. Different types of vegetation alternate in the region: floodable palm groves of Copernicia alba (Aracaceae), forests of Schinopsis balansae (Anacardiaceae; willow-leaf red quebracho or Quebracho Colorado) and ancient floodplain xeric forests (Rodríguez et al. 2018).

The specimen (MG-ZV-M:415) was an adult female (Anthony 1988; Brunet-Rossinni and Austad 2004), with perforated vagina (Barquez et al. 2021), active mammary glands, and distended uterus at the time of dissection. The distinctive character of this species is the length of the forearm, which reaches 68.20 mm (Table 1). The general coloration is blackish brown and membranes are dark, almost black. The plagiopatagium is attached at the medial part of the tibia (Figure 2). The ears are shorter than the length of the head, and do not surpass the tip of the snout when laid forward. The antitragus has a semicircular shape and is wider than high. The tragus is small and pointed, unlike to that of Eumops glaucinus in which it is bigger and square. The dental formula is I 1/2, C 1/1, P 2/2, M 3/3 (Figure 3).

Due to their similar sizes, E. glaucinus is the only species that can be confused with E. auripendulus. This new record matches with the descriptions made by Barquez et al. (1999) and Best et al. (2002) for E. auripendulus, both in external and cranial measurements (Table 1). In contrast to E. glaucinus, which has a paler fur coloration, this specimen has a dark brown color, and the ears are shorter than the head when laid forward, not exceeding in length the tip of the snout. The skull, although similar to that of E. glaucinus, shows a more developed sagittal crest (Eger 1977; Barquez et al. 1999; Best et al. 1997, 2002), which was evident although it could not be measured due to the fracture of the upper part of the skull for rabies virus analysis. 

Eumops auripendulus is a species poorly known in Argentina, only 10 historical records between 1968 and 1978. This new record of E. auripendulus in Santa Fe province is particularly important, partly because this species has not been reported for 41 years in Argentina, but also because it occurs within the southernmost limits of the known distribution of the species. In addition, the species is added to an ecoregion where it was not previously reported (Humid Chaco), about 400 km NE of the southernmost known record (Esperanza - Santa Fe - Espinal ecoregion), 70 km S of the Chaco province record (Delta and Islands of Paraná ecoregion), and 395 km SW of the closest Misiones province record (Paranaense Forests ecoregion).

Although the knowledge about the richness and distribution of these mammals in Santa Fe has increased in recent years (Barquez et al. 1999, Barquez 2006; Pautasso 2008; Pautasso and Arnaudo 2009; Pautasso et al. 2009; Pavé et al. 2017, 2021; Montani et al. 2018, 2020, 2021; Pavé and Gavazza 2022), most of the specimens were collected accidentally. Consequently, there is still an important lack of information related to the knowledge of bats in the province, so field work and cooperation between institutions and researchers, as is the case of this research, are essential tools to achieve a deeper understanding of the bat fauna of Santa Fe province.

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Teta, General Curator of the Mammals Section of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia", Argentina; I. Olivares, head of the Mammalogy Section of the Museo de La Plata, Argentina; S. Bogan, Curator of Scientific Collections at the Fundación Azara, Argentina; and B. K. Lim, Associate Curator of Mammalogy, Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Canadá, for providing information on the historical records of all specimens, housed in the Museums. Two anonymous reviewers helped improve an earlier version of this paper.

Literature cited

Anthony, E. L. P. 1988. Age determination in bats. Pp. 47–58 in Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats (Kunz, T. H., ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington D. C., U.S.A. 

Barquez, R. M. 2006. Orden Chiroptera. Pp. 56–86 in Mamíferos de Argentina, sistemática y distribución (Barquez, R. M., M. M. Díaz, and R. Ojeda, eds.). Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM). Mendoza, Argentina.

Barquez, R. M., M. A. Mares, and J. K. Braun. 1999. The bats of Argentina. Special Publication. Museum of Texas Tech University 42:1–275.

Barquez, R. M., and M. M. Díaz. 2020. Nueva guía de los murciélagos de Argentina. Con la colaboración de: M. E. Montani y M. J. Pérez. Publicación Especial Nº 3. Programa de Conservación de los Murciélagos de Argentina. Tucumán, Argentina.

Barquez, R. M., et al. 2015. Eumops auripendulus (errata version published in 2016). In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015: e.T8241A97206888. Accessed on March 30, 2023.

Barquez, R. M., et al. 2021. Colección Mamíferos Lillo: un manual de procedimientos para la preparación y conservación de mamíferos y anexos. Publicaciones Especiales PIDBA Nº 6. Instituto de Investigaciones de Biodiversidad Argentina. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.

Best, T. L., W. M. Kiser, and J. C. Rainey. 1997. Eumops glaucinus. Mammalian Species 551:1–6.

Best, T. L., et al. 2002. Eumops auripendulus. Mammalian Species 708:1–5.

Biasatti, N. R., et al. 2015. Las ecoregiones, su conservación y las Áreas Naturales Protegidas de la provincia de Santa Fe. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Santa Fe, Argentina.

Brunet-Rossinni, A. K., and S. N. Austad. 2004. Ageing studies on bats: a review. Biogerontology 5:211–22.

Burkart, R., et al. 1999. Eco-regiones de la Argentina. Administración de Parques Nacionales – Programa de Desarrollo Institucional Ambiental. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Díaz, M. M., and R. M. Barquez. 2019. Eumops auripendulus. In Categorización 2019 de los mamíferos de Argentina según su riesgo de extinción. Lista Roja de los mamíferos de Argentina. Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación (SAyDS) and Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM) (eds.). Accessed on March 29, 2023.

Díaz, M. M., et al. 2021. Clave de identificación de los murciélagos Neotropicales / Chave de identificação dos morcegos Neotropicais. Publicación Especial Nº 4. Programa de Conservación de los Murciélagos de Argentina. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.

Eger, J. L. 1977. Systematics of the genus Eumops (Chiroptera: Molossidae). Life Sciences Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum 110:1–69.

Eger, J. L. 2007. Family Molossidae P. Gervais, 1856. Pp: 399–439 in Mammals of South America. Volume 1. Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews and Bats (Gardner, A. L., ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, U.S.A.

Gregorin, R., et al. 2016. A new species of Eumops (Chiroptera: Molossidae) from southeastern Brazil and Bolivia. Mammalian Biology 81:235–246.

Matteucci, S. D. 2018. Ecorregión Espinal. Pp: 395–439 in Ecorregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos, 2nd ed. (Morello, J., S. Matteucci, A. Rodríguez, and M. Silva, eds.). Orientación Gráfica Editora. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Montani, M. E., et al. 2018. First records of Myotis nigricans (Schinz, 1821) (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) and two new localities for three bat species in Santa Fe province, Argentina. Check List 14:737–742.

Montani, M. E., A. A. Pautasso, and M. M. Díaz. 2020. First record of Promops centralis Thomas, 1915 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Santa Fe province, Argentina. Check List 16:1133–1137.

Montani, M. E., et al. 2021. A new species of Molossus (Chiroptera: Molossidae) from Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 102:1426–1442.

Morello, J., et al. 2018. Ecorregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos. Orientación Gráfica Editora. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Novaes, R. L. M., et al. 2022. Argentinean Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae), including the description of a new species from the Yungas. Vertebrate Zoology 72:1187–1216.

Pautasso, A. A. 2008. Mamíferos de la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. Comunicaciones del Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales “Florentino Ameghino” 13:1-248.

Pautasso, A. A., and M. E. Arnaudo. 2009. Primeros registros del murcielaguito rojo (Myotis ruber) para la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. Biológica 10:5961.

Pautasso, A. A., et al. 2009. Observaciones sobre los murciélagos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) de la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. Natura Neotropicalis 40:95101.

Pavé, R., et al. 2017. Nuevos registros de murciélagos para la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 24:153162.

Pavé, R., et al. 2021. Nuevos registros de murciélagos (Mammalia: Chiroptera) para las provincias de Entre Ríos y Santa Fe, Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Nueva Serie 23:15–25. 

Pavé, R., and A. I. Gavazza. 2022. Primer registro de Myotis simus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) para la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Nueva Serie 24:99–107. 

Rodríguez, A. F., M. E. Silva, and J. Morello. 2018. Ecorregión Chaco Húmedo. Pp 211–230 in Ecorregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos, 2nd ed. (Morello, J., S. Matteucci, A. Rodríguez, and M. Silva, eds.). Orientación Gráfica. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Sodré, M. M., et al. 2008. Range extension for Thomas’ Mastiff bat Eumops maurus (Chiroptera: Molossidae) in northern, central and southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 25:379–382.

Teta, P., and D. Rodríguez. 2021. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" (MACN). Mammalogy National Collection (MACNMa). Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. Accessed via GBIF.org on March 15, 2023. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/621080327.

Associated editor: Jesús R. Hernández Montero.

Submitted: April 12, 2023; Reviewed: June 6, 2023.

Accepted: June 15, 2023; Published on line: June 23, 2023.

Figure 1. Records of Eumops auripendulus from Santa Fe province, Argentina. Triangles = records listed in Barquez and Díaz (2020); star = new locality (Florencia, General Obligado department, Santa Fe province).

Table 1. Mean, standard deviation and number of specimens (n) of the external and cranial measurements (mm) of E. auripendulus major from Argentina (Barquez et al. 1999), and the new record from Santa Fe province (MG-ZV-M:415).

Variable

Barquez et al. (1999)

MG-ZV-M:415

Total length

138.60 ± 8.38 (n = 5) 125.00 - 148.00

139.00

Tail length

50.8 ± 4.54 (n = 5) 47.00 - 58.00

53.00

Hindfoot length

10.80 ± 2.04 (n = 5) 9.00 - 13.00

14.00

Ear length

19.80 ± 4.08 (n = 5) 13.00 - 23.00

21.00

Forearm length

65.00 ± 3.08 (5) 61.00 - 69.00

68.20

Weight

36.00

Condylobasal length

26.10 ± 5.10 (n = 4) 23.50 - 33.80

25.20

Least interorbital breadth

8.20 ± 0.05 (n = 3) 8.20 - 8.30

7.88

Zygomatic breadth

15.50 ± 0.50 (n = 5) 14.90 - 16.20

15.50

Greatest length of skull

25.30 ± 0.45 (n = 5) 24.60 - 25.70

25.66

Postorbital constriction

5.10 ± 0.15 (n = 5) 5.00 - 5.30

5.16

Breadth of braincase

12.00 ± 0.15 (n = 3) 11.90 - 12.20

12.00

Length of maxillary toothrow

9.90 ± 0.28 (n = 3) 9.60 - 10.10

10.20

Palatal length

9.90 ± 0.41 (n = 3) 9.50 - 10.30

10.64

Mastoidal breadth

13.40 ± 0.45 (n = 3) 13.00 - 13.90

13.22

Length of mandibular toothrow

10.90 ± 0.35 (n = 3) 10.60 - 11.30

11.10

Length of mandible

19.30 ± 0.84 (n = 5) 18.20 - 20.30

19.72

C-C (width across canines)

6.50 ± 0.37 (n = 3) 6.30 - 7.00

6.62

M-M (width across molars)

10.50 ± 0.15 (n = 3) 10.40 - 10.70

10.06

Figure 2. Ventral and dorsal view of the skin of Eumops auripendulus (MG-ZV-M:415) from Florencia, General Obligado department, Santa Fe province, Argentina. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Figure 3. Lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of the skull and lateral view of the mandible of Eumops auripendulus (MG-ZV-M:415) from Florencia, General Obligado department, Santa Fe province, Argentina. Scale bar = 10 mm.